Originally posted by SimonMac
View Post
However, I hate it when Agencies add their crappy logos to my considered CV format. Most often, they do so without even bothering to tell me so I only discover at the interview that their Picasso painting version of my CV has formed the client's first impression of me. Heaven knows why, but the ones that do this for some reason best known to themselves seem to think they're ingenious graphic artists, plastering low-res watermarks of their logo all over the document and distracting from the content.
Agencies that do this also tend to do equally-unhelpful things such as remove the links to my online portfolio and technical blog, out of some misguided fear that the client might contact me themselves. They even do it when you send your CV in PDF format - they just cut and paste it into a new Word document, knowing full well it wasn't your intent that your CV should be altered.
That's why I do most of my own first contacts these days. And, when forced to go through an agency, I always carry a paper copy or two of my CV to give to the client at the interview so they can compare the two.
I had this experience last week, when I discovered the CV they were working from looked something like this:
When I gave them my own CV they brightened up a bit, and commented on how badly laid out and full of grammatical errors the version from the agency had been. I ended up blowing that particular organisation out anyway since I was as unimpressed by them as they seemed to be by the agency. I chose one of the other two companies that I'd contacted through LinkedIn myself instead.
I don't know how things are for you guys down South, but up here that seems to be the way things are going: JobServe and agencies are next to useless right now. Direct contacts instigated through LinkedIn appears to be the new way to go about marketing yourself.
Leave a comment: