• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Fixed term employment contracts"

Collapse

  • Robinho
    replied
    Originally posted by escapeUK View Post
    How strange given that no redundancy is due until after a year of employment. After that its 1 week for each year served.
    Yeah i had no idea why they did that but as you can imagine, i did not hang around to find out, i got my sig on the documents ASAFP.

    It might have been an internal policy or there may have been breach of contract because it was so quickly after i signed. They went bankrupt 6 months later.

    That's actually what got me into contracting. I had a nice holiday in the US and then upped my certifications and had a warchest to look for that first contract job.

    Leave a comment:


  • alreadypacked
    replied
    Originally posted by escapeUK View Post
    How strange given that no redundancy is due until after a year of employment. After that its 1 week for each year served.
    You are talking about mandatory payout, there is nothing to stop a company paying out a higher amount.

    Leave a comment:


  • escapeUK
    replied
    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
    I did 6 months of this one.

    After that was up they gave me a permanent job.

    A month later they made me redundant and i got a 15k payout.

    That was a good summer.
    How strange given that no redundancy is due until after a year of employment. After that its 1 week for each year served.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    I thought once you'd been somewhere two years in this way you became a permie automatically (as far as rights go), sort of like how you can be common-law husband & wife. In teaching it works this way so I assumed that was a general law but perhaps it's specific to teaching/public-service contracts, I never read one to check!
    I don't know in the intricacies of this but yes I think you are right. Doesn't stop them giving you a 6 month contract 4 times which if you are the type that just wants a job and not to worry isn't much use.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    This type of a contract is a disgrace in my opinion. I believe Bupa for one and many other large companies do it and can roll it over for a number of years before they are obliged to make a full time offer
    I thought once you'd been somewhere two years in this way you became a permie automatically (as far as rights go), sort of like how you can be common-law husband & wife. In teaching it works this way so I assumed that was a general law but perhaps it's specific to teaching/public-service contracts, I never read one to check!

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Do you like films about Gladiators?

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    This type of a contract is a disgrace in my opinion.
    It's just an offer, nobody's forced to take it.

    When i did it i got permie perks. Hols, pension, training etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    This type of a contract is a disgrace in my opinion. I believe Bupa for one and many other large companies do it and can roll it over for a number of years before they are obliged to make a full time offer. All the responsibilities of a full timer but with no perks. I don't believe the BUPA temps even get the full health cover during this fixed period contract period.

    If this type of practice takes on there won't be such thing as a permies unless you have been there for 2 years giving companies free reign to chop when they want with no come back. Dangerous ground IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gentile
    replied
    Originally posted by thecolour View Post
    Hello folks!

    I am considering a job offer where the employer is having significant difficulty getting sign off for a permanent contract.

    They are offering me a 12 month fixed length contract instead which they assure me will be converted to a permanent contract once the 12 months is over.

    I have read on ukgov that these are very insecure (one weeks notice of termination during first three months). My question is has anyone had any experience of these contracts? Are they comparable in any way to either perm or "proper" contract (with daily rate, etc)

    Is it worth my while doing this (accepting a permy salary for what is in effect a contract). Advice welcome...

    Many thanks in advance.
    It really depend on your situation. When I worked in the Police seven years or so ago (so, during boom time), everyone was on 2 years Fixed Term Contracts, which were always renewed (although a high percentage chose to leave because of the bureaucracy, and because it was easy enough to get a job elsewhere). In other parts of the Civil Service, once you're in you're free to stay where you are, or apply for other internally-advertised only roles; it's all but impossible to lose your job.

    Right now, times are tough in certain geographic areas, and I could well understand a recent graduate taking a 12 month contract as a way of getting their career started and their foot in the door somewhere. I could even understand more experienced candidates considering it, depending on their situation. As ever, you need to evaluate the whole opportunity, and decide whether it's right for you as an individual based on what the opportunity represents to you and on what other options you have.

    Do you mind explaining a bit more about the role?
    • Is it Private or Public sector?
    • Is it a job doing what you want to do? (Albeit you'd like to be retained on a more permanent basis).
    • Is it your first real job after Uni?
    • Is it your first offer after a while spent looking?


    For me, the answers to these questions would be key to deciding whether it represented a 'good' opportunity or not.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    I did 6 months of this one.

    After that was up they gave me a permanent job.

    A month later they made me redundant and i got a 15k payout.

    That was a good summer.

    Leave a comment:


  • BigTime
    replied
    You're effectively a temp. You should be paid more to cover any benefits that a permie would get that you'll be missing out on here. Most perm jobs have a probation period of 3 months whereas this one appears to have 12.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scoobos
    replied
    Before I begin, I'm no expert.

    IMO, you have very little rights on employment until you are there 24 months anyway .

    This is a permanent contract, in that it is a contract of Full Time Employment.

    Everyone has a contract of employment, this is not what "contracting" means, it means a Business 2 Business contract not an employment one.

    If you want the job take it, if not don't - thats the only way I see it.

    Leave a comment:


  • thecolour
    started a topic Fixed term employment contracts

    Fixed term employment contracts

    Hello folks!

    I am considering a job offer where the employer is having significant difficulty getting sign off for a permanent contract.

    They are offering me a 12 month fixed length contract instead which they assure me will be converted to a permanent contract once the 12 months is over.

    I have read on ukgov that these are very insecure (one weeks notice of termination during first three months). My question is has anyone had any experience of these contracts? Are they comparable in any way to either perm or "proper" contract (with daily rate, etc)

    Is it worth my while doing this (accepting a permy salary for what is in effect a contract). Advice welcome...

    Many thanks in advance.

Working...
X