Reply to: Thanks

[louie]

How many of those 99 are are accountancy related?

101.

[Old Greg]

What issues? I got 99 problems and a sockie ain't one.

How many of those 99 are are accountancy related?

[louie]

As a child? Is this where your issues stem from?

What issues? I got 99 problems and a sockie ain't one.

[Old Greg]

touché

As a child? Is this where your issues stem from?

[louie]

Touchy!

touché

[Old Greg]

I expect we will see your name and address posted here soon then?

Touchy!

[louie]

+1. And most confidentiality clauses contain a twat exception sub-clause.

I expect we will see your name and address posted here soon then?

[Old Greg]

I would agree too, but the point is that the accountancy firm in question, NW, did not post private confidential information relating to one of its clients, in fact they went out of their way to help their client and only when their client started throwing toys out the pram threatening legal action based upon what was commonly seen as the idiots own fault did they then describe basic accounting practices that the client failed to understand even though they had emailed them in an idiots guide, nothing personal was posted simply defending their reputation from a trolling idiot.

+1. And most confidentiality clauses contain a twat exception sub-clause.

[chef]

I have to add, whoever the forum poster is - I totally agree with this statement.

I would agree too, but the point is that the accountancy firm in question, NW, did not post private confidential information relating to one of its clients, in fact they went out of their way to help their client and only when their client started throwing toys out the pram threatening legal action based upon what was commonly seen as the idiots own fault did they then describe basic accounting practices that the client failed to understand even though they had emailed them in an idiots guide, nothing personal was posted simply defending their reputation from a trolling idiot.

[d000hg]

I have to add, whoever the forum poster is - I totally agree with this statement.

Witch Sockie, burn ban him!

[Scoobos]

All I know is if I saw a Accountant posting confidential private accounting information to counter a valid criticism from a paying client , I would steer well clear.

I have to add, whoever the forum poster is - I totally agree with this statement.

[d000hg]

It was worth repeating.

[eek]

Sorry I missed that

Maybe he'll spend his week-long ban learning how to do his own accounts. More likely he'll be trolling on some other forum.

Don't worry. I just wanted to post the same insult a second time.

[MaryPoppins]

Bums. Have I missed all the fun again?

[d000hg]

Sorry I missed that

Maybe he'll spend his week-long ban learning how to do his own accounts. More likely he'll be trolling on some other forum.