• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Thanks

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by russell View Post
    All I know is if I saw a Accountant posting confidential private accounting information to counter a valid criticism from a paying client , I would steer well clear.
    I have to add, whoever the forum poster is - I totally agree with this statement.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Scoobos View Post
      I have to add, whoever the forum poster is - I totally agree with this statement.
      Witch Sockie, burn ban him!
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        Originally posted by Scoobos View Post
        I have to add, whoever the forum poster is - I totally agree with this statement.
        I would agree too, but the point is that the accountancy firm in question, NW, did not post private confidential information relating to one of its clients, in fact they went out of their way to help their client and only when their client started throwing toys out the pram threatening legal action based upon what was commonly seen as the idiots own fault did they then describe basic accounting practices that the client failed to understand even though they had emailed them in an idiots guide, nothing personal was posted simply defending their reputation from a trolling idiot.
        The proud owner of 125 Xeno Geek Points

        Comment


          Originally posted by chef View Post
          I would agree too, but the point is that the accountancy firm in question, NW, did not post private confidential information relating to one of its clients, in fact they went out of their way to help their client and only when their client started throwing toys out the pram threatening legal action based upon what was commonly seen as the idiots own fault did they then describe basic accounting practices that the client failed to understand even though they had emailed them in an idiots guide, nothing personal was posted simply defending their reputation from a trolling idiot.
          +1. And most confidentiality clauses contain a twat exception sub-clause.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
            +1. And most confidentiality clauses contain a twat exception sub-clause.
            I expect we will see your name and address posted here soon then?

            Comment


              Originally posted by louie View Post
              I expect we will see your name and address posted here soon then?
              Touchy!

              Comment


                Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                Touchy!


                touché

                Comment


                  Originally posted by louie View Post
                  touché
                  As a child? Is this where your issues stem from?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                    As a child? Is this where your issues stem from?
                    What issues? I got 99 problems and a sockie ain't one.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by louie View Post
                      What issues? I got 99 problems and a sockie ain't one.
                      How many of those 99 are are accountancy related?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X