Reply to: Does the G-spot exist?

[Diver]

Originally Posted by BrilloPad
G-spot 'does exist' - Telegraph

IMO if god had wanted men to find it he would have coloured it dayglo orange.

and put a sign on it saying "Free beer, food and footy this way"

[stevejohnson]

G-spot 'does exist' - Telegraph

IMO if god had wanted men to find it he would have coloured it dayglo orange.

yes , it is in and then up

[SupremeSpod]

Is "in the name of science" an official defence in the divorce courts?

I don't think Josef Mengele succeeded with that plea.
:nazi:

[BrilloPad]

I have been trying all my life to knob 'all women'. I've only managed a tiny fraction and Im flipping worn out. But you are right, I will persevere in the name of science

Is "in the name of science" an official defence in the divorce courts?

[d000hg]

With a sample size of one used to support an assertion about all women. Hardly "proper science".

Unless it's a tumour or other growth, which they can check, it's fine. You rarely find optional organs

[darmstadt]

You do have a g-spot:

[TimberWolf]

I have been trying all my life to knob 'all women'.

[EternalOptimist]

More power to your elbow...

<cough>

[SupremeSpod]

I have been trying all my life to knob 'all women'. I've only managed a tiny fraction and Im flipping worn out. But you are right, I will persevere in the name of science

More power to your elbow...

[EternalOptimist]

With a sample size of one used to support an assertion about all women. Hardly "proper science".

I have been trying all my life to knob 'all women'. I've only managed a tiny fraction and Im flipping worn out. But you are right, I will persevere in the name of science

[NickFitz]

In other words, it's proper empirical science based on anatomy. Rather than asking women to do a survey.

With a sample size of one used to support an assertion about all women. Hardly "proper science".

[Grasser73]

I never could find Mrs Grasser's G-spot. Turns out her sister had it all the time.

[BrilloPad]

As usual with MSM's reporting of science, it's instructive to find out what the research on which they based the story actually said.

In this case, the "evidence" in the original paper came from a sample of one woman. Who was 83 years old. And dead.

It's actually an autopsy report

Maybe women only grow a g-spot when they are 82? Or when they die?

[d000hg]

As usual with MSM's reporting of science, it's instructive to find out what the research on which they based the story actually said.

In this case, the "evidence" in the original paper came from a sample of one woman. Who was 83 years old. And dead.

It's actually an autopsy report

In other words, it's proper empirical science based on anatomy. Rather than asking women to do a survey.

[EternalOptimist]

As usual with MSM's reporting of science, it's instructive to find out what the research on which they based the story actually said.

In this case, the "evidence" in the original paper came from a sample of one woman. Who was 83 years old. And dead.

It's actually an autopsy report

I liked this bit


'Dr Ostrzenski of the Institute of Gynecology in St. Petersburg, Florida, said it was sad that the ladies husband had preceded her, because they would have liked to get his [story], but it was worth noting that he must have been in a state of arousal because when he died, aged 85, because it " took four large men to get the lid on his coffin screwed down " one of the undertakers, Leroy Rastus said ' that wernt no rigger mortis man, no sirree' '