Does the G-spot exist?

[d000hg]

As usual with MSM's reporting of science, it's instructive to find out what the research on which they based the story actually said.

In this case, the "evidence" in the original paper came from a sample of one woman. Who was 83 years old. And dead.

It's actually an autopsy report

In other words, it's proper empirical science based on anatomy. Rather than asking women to do a survey.

[BrilloPad]

As usual with MSM's reporting of science, it's instructive to find out what the research on which they based the story actually said.

In this case, the "evidence" in the original paper came from a sample of one woman. Who was 83 years old. And dead.

It's actually an autopsy report

Maybe women only grow a g-spot when they are 82? Or when they die?

[Grasser73]

I never could find Mrs Grasser's G-spot. Turns out her sister had it all the time.

[NickFitz]

In other words, it's proper empirical science based on anatomy. Rather than asking women to do a survey.

With a sample size of one used to support an assertion about all women. Hardly "proper science".

[EternalOptimist]

With a sample size of one used to support an assertion about all women. Hardly "proper science".

I have been trying all my life to knob 'all women'. I've only managed a tiny fraction and Im flipping worn out. But you are right, I will persevere in the name of science

[SupremeSpod]

I have been trying all my life to knob 'all women'. I've only managed a tiny fraction and Im flipping worn out. But you are right, I will persevere in the name of science

More power to your elbow...

[EternalOptimist]

More power to your elbow...

<cough>

[TimberWolf]

I have been trying all my life to knob 'all women'.

[darmstadt]

You do have a g-spot:

[d000hg]

With a sample size of one used to support an assertion about all women. Hardly "proper science".

Unless it's a tumour or other growth, which they can check, it's fine. You rarely find optional organs