• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The "I could have told you that for nothing" award for scientific research goes to..."

Collapse

  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    So which brand of gassy beer goes best in a fusion reactor?
    Heineken. Because it refreshes the quarks that other beers cannot reach.

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by Pogle View Post
    Why shopping of course
    A little basic research would indicate that shopping takes second place to chatting through social networking sites........

    Source - Wife

    Leave a comment:


  • Pogle
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Have they worked out what women use the internet for yet?
    Why shopping of course

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    What happens is that some project publishes. It's picked up by a science journalist, who writes an eye-catching headline, which is read by non-scientists, who then think that what's been studied wasn't at all worthwhile, even if they bother reading the article itself, because they're relying on the journo's interpretation, which is itself aimed at the non-scientific.

    It's worse when it's a big story because while the science journalist usually has some background in science, they'll be relatively junior. Big stories go to big names who's science understanding is often zero. Then you end up with, e.g. autism/mmr scares.

    This particular bit of research "..was to find out how close, intimate relationships vary over a lifetime. This kind of anthropological study is normally very difficult to do because it is hard for researchers to get such a big picture of people's lives. But by looking at an at an extremely large mobile phone database, they were able to track these changes extremely accurately. "

    The headline was just one result that the journalist thought would be most relevant to the average thick as pigtulip reader. It wasn't the purpose of the research.

    There was a similar reaction to the "study of beer bubbles". The actual application of that was to do with fusion reactors, IIRC.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    The Pope definitely doesn't tulip in the woods.

    Leave a comment:


  • pmeswani
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Not while they hibernate
    We need to research this to make sure.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    Do bears tulip in the woods?
    Not while they hibernate

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
    Didn't someone get a research grant for studying the effects of alchol on students, and then paid students to go out and get drunk

    Proving that students will get drunk if offered free alcohol, let alone paid to drink it...who'd have guessed
    One of my lecturers managed that, he worked on Breathalysers they had to test them! One of his favourite stories.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by wim121 View Post
    Pointless research: top 10 Ig Nobel award winners for silly science - Telegraph

    What's more sad is they won nobel awards for that .....
    its the Ig Nobel you ignoramus - they are meant celebrate the more obscure/funny pieces of scientific research

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Have they worked out what women use the internet for yet?
    mumsnet

    Leave a comment:


  • bless 'em all
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Have they worked out what women use the internet for yet?
    Porn, same as us fellas.

    NEXT!

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Alf W View Post
    Have they worked out what women use the internet for yet?

    Leave a comment:


  • amcdonald
    replied
    Didn't someone get a research grant for studying the effects of alchol on students, and then paid students to go out and get drunk

    Proving that students will get drunk if offered free alcohol, let alone paid to drink it...who'd have guessed

    Leave a comment:


  • wim121
    replied
    Originally posted by Alf W View Post
    How about these pointless studies and more:

    Suicide rates are linked to the amount of country music played on the radio, winner, Medicine, 2004
    Ducks can be homosexual necrophiliacs too (winner, Biology, 2003)
    Why woodpeckers don’t get headaches – winner, Ornithology, 2006
    Pointless research: top 10 Ig Nobel award winners for silly science - Telegraph

    What's more sad is they won nobel awards for that .....

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    once they have made their mind up, they just go for the poor bloke until he keels over and gives in!
    Half the population could have told you that. The other half could have told you as well but they'd never admit it.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X