Originally posted by MarillionFan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The "I could have told you that for nothing" award for scientific research goes to...
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostNot while they hibernateIf your company is the best place to work in, for a mere £500 p/d, you can advertise here.Comment
-
-
What happens is that some project publishes. It's picked up by a science journalist, who writes an eye-catching headline, which is read by non-scientists, who then think that what's been studied wasn't at all worthwhile, even if they bother reading the article itself, because they're relying on the journo's interpretation, which is itself aimed at the non-scientific.
It's worse when it's a big story because while the science journalist usually has some background in science, they'll be relatively junior. Big stories go to big names who's science understanding is often zero. Then you end up with, e.g. autism/mmr scares.
This particular bit of research "..was to find out how close, intimate relationships vary over a lifetime. This kind of anthropological study is normally very difficult to do because it is hard for researchers to get such a big picture of people's lives. But by looking at an at an extremely large mobile phone database, they were able to track these changes extremely accurately. "
The headline was just one result that the journalist thought would be most relevant to the average thick as pigtulip reader. It wasn't the purpose of the research.
There was a similar reaction to the "study of beer bubbles". The actual application of that was to do with fusion reactors, IIRC.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostHave they worked out what women use the internet for yet?I'm sorry, but I'll make no apologies for this
Pogle is awarded +5 Xeno Geek Points.
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010
CUK University Challenge Champions 2012Comment
-
Originally posted by Pogle View PostWhy shopping of course
Source - WifeConfusion is a natural state of beingComment
-
Originally posted by zeitghostSo which brand of gassy beer goes best in a fusion reactor?If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Comment