• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The hexadecimal counting thread"

Collapse

  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    ESC.

    0x1c
    We should send all posts from ESC onwards to an Epson FX-80 and see what it ends up doing.

    &1D

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    NickFitz! Help!!!
    EBCDIC - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    &1B

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    I've never implemented it but I toyed with the idea of using a Base-ASCII numbering system where we use alphanumeric digits [0-9][a-z][A-Z]. I think that's base-62. I forget what the purpose of it was though.
    That's basically the technique used for things like YouTube videos, URL shorteners, and other web applications that require humongous numbers of unique content identifiers without being able to split stuff across a hierarchy (or other way of partitioning the space of identifiers).

    Edit: &1A

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    A clue, I work in EBCDIC...
    NickFitz! Help!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    &18

    BBC BASIC style

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost


    Got it in one.

    I've never implemented it but I toyed with the idea of using a Base-ASCII numbering system where we use alphanumeric digits [0-9][a-z][A-Z]. I think that's base-62. I forget what the purpose of it was though.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Hex to ascii gives :-

    ??I??H???I???H????????dPf? ?U?`yg?@??W?S???

    A clue, I work in EBCDIC...

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    e9984984aa488a84a949998989489488a888889894
    26450660420815503607967914095085714539413b
    Hex to ascii gives :-

    ??I??H???I???H????????dPf? ?U?`yg?@??W?S???

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    e9984984aa488a84a949998989489488a888889894
    26450660420815503607967914095085714539413b

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    So how far had we got? Had we reached oXo yet?

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    0x0g
    Would this be septadecimal?

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    0xdeadbeef

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    ...oh my God...what do we do now?
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    0x0g
    1x00?

    Where has NickFitz gone

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    ...oh my God...what do we do now?

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    oh God this is excruciatingly slow...

    0x0b
    0x0c
    0x0d
    0x0e
    0x0f

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X