Reply to: Some days I am glad I looked at the Daily Mail

[TimberWolf]

Where's the real link? All I see is pussies.

[northernladuk]

Its because you are not part of the Clique which allows you to get away with anything, that or no one complained about that one but did about yours?!

Man up

PS And oh yes I would certainly hit it

LOL loving that gif

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to SimonMac again.

[Platypus]

Nice pussy!

[SimonMac]

Wasn't getting at you, it is fairly obvious when you are going to post one (I thought my link was fairly obvious), but it does seem a little odd that you can get away with posting embedded images in a thread and nobody bats an eyelid, but I post a link to woman in her undies and I get slagged for it, somebody negs me for it and the mods edit the post to put a NSFW on it.

Its because you are not part of the Clique which allows you to get away with anything, that or no one complained about that one but did about yours?!

Man up

PS And oh yes I would certainly hit it

[doodab]

Might try considering the other people on this thread who are logging in at work when posting news stories with pics like this..

Dunno about other people's work places but this is most definitely NSFW where I am.

Not Sufficiently Fat Woman?

I had no idea you were a chubby chaser.

[cojak]

Wasn't getting at you, it is fairly obvious when you are going to post one (I thought my link was fairly obvious), but it does seem a little odd that you can get away with posting embedded images in a thread and nobody bats an eyelid, but I post a link to woman in her undies and I get slagged for it, somebody negs me for it and the mods edit the post to put a NSFW on it.

Honestly, don't be so sensitive.

I didn't put it in Light Relief, did I?

[cojak]

& oh god yes I would

Ditto.

[Arturo Bassick]

good effort


For those who are concerned that I might sometimes embed slightly NSFW pics, a hint. Either the thread will have a 'would you/wouldn't you' type theme, or I will first tag a thread 'this thread needs girls'.

Wasn't getting at you, it is fairly obvious when you are going to post one (I thought my link was fairly obvious), but it does seem a little odd that you can get away with posting embedded images in a thread and nobody bats an eyelid, but I post a link to woman in her undies and I get slagged for it, somebody negs me for it and the mods edit the post to put a NSFW on it.

[The Spartan]

Large portion, yes please!!!

[Mich the Tester]

good effort


For those who are concerned that I might sometimes embed slightly NSFW pics, a hint. Either the thread will have a 'would you/wouldn't you' type theme, or I will first tag a thread 'this thread needs girls'.

[d000hg]

Is there not a clue in the text of the link?

And using CUK at work is caveat emptor in the first place.

[Halo Jones]

& oh god yes I would

[northernladuk]

Is there not a clue in the text of the link?

There is that I guess but just thought some warning might have been nice. There is no fix for my stupidity so have to get help from other areas.

[Arturo Bassick]

Might try considering the other people on this thread who are logging in at work when posting news stories with pics like this..

Dunno about other people's work places but this is most definitely NSFW where I am.

I notice you dont complain when others embed pictures in threads. Is it something I said you tedious twat!

Same applies to MOD note. MTT embeds stuff that is just as NSFW and nothing happens??? WTFITAA!

Dita Von Teese and Lingerie is a fairly major clue even for the most feckwitted member here.

[DimPrawn]

Might try considering the other people on this thread who are logging in at work when posting news stories with pics like this..

Dunno about other people's work places but this is most definitely NSFW where I am.

Is there not a clue in the text of the link?