• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: SOPA - anyone GAS?

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "SOPA - anyone GAS?"

Collapse

  • cojak
    replied
    And if anyone wonders why I'm harsh with bogus posters/ businesses posting links to their own sites without really helping others, wait 10 minutes and then google 'parasite marketing'.

    It will all become clear...

    Internet Marketers; I eat them for breakfast.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    Two
    WE have a winner Ladies and Gentlemen!

    Step up for your cuddly toy sonny (but don't pull that thread if you want the ears to stay on....)

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Two

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Err, okay for some reason the moderator removed the link to the extension page, and didn't even keep the name, making it impossible to find out what the message was talking about.

    To find the new extension, Google "canisbos gDirectLinks" and you will be able to find it. Not sure I can see the harm of posting the direct link? Especially since the thread was discussing the very subject of suitable extensions for solving this problem?

    To mods: If it's okay, the direct link is once again: Mod reply:No, it's not OK.
    Hope I've helped someone!
    Last edited by cojak; 17 May 2012, 13:21. Reason: Some people to too thick-skinned for their own good.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    They seem to be turning the whole of Google into a pain nowadays.

    For Safari users: I Don’t Want to Be Counted, I Just Want Links
    Hi! The extension you're linking to is bad, and doesn't handle Google Instant results.

    Canisbos (a very talented Safari extension programmer) has now created a new extension that's a super-efficient subset of his full LinkThing extension.

    The new extension only handles Google, and it does so in an extremely resource-light fashion, and with complete support for Google Instant results.

    This is for anyone that just wants the right to more privacy and link control on Google. No longer will you have to visit a page just to be able to copy a clean URL. No longer will your Safari history be filled with non-sense "google.com/url?..." entries rather than the real page.

    It even has the option of re-writing Google Images results to point directly to the image, if you want it to. That's available in the options. It's a fantastic extension, and is the best one in its field!

    So, without further ado, go and download <mod note you can guess, can't you?>, the definitive word in getting rid of this Google annoyance!

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by PAH View Post
    Even simpler:

    Use Google's cached version of the English pages while offline.

    [For those wondering where the 'cached' link is on Google, they've moved it into the instant preview pane, which is a pain.]
    They seem to be turning the whole of Google into a pain nowadays.

    For Safari users: I Don’t Want to Be Counted, I Just Want Links

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    only the english language part of wikipedia is closing. So just find what you need on the french, german or spanish pages and run them through google translate

    Even simpler:

    Use Google's cached version of the English pages while offline.

    [For those wondering where the 'cached' link is on Google, they've moved it into the instant preview pane, which is a pain.]

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Surprisingly, the French version is considerably superior to the English in one very important respect: it mentions me
    I'm not sure it's still there, but the Finnish wiki used to have a link to a site I was working on.

    It was a complete bugger to edit it when I changed the article's location, as I don't understand a word of Finnish.

    I lost heart when they restored an older version from backups, so did a redirect at my end instead.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    only the english language part of wikipedia is closing. So just find what you need on the french, german or spanish pages and run them through google translate
    Surprisingly, the French version is considerably superior to the English in one very important respect: it mentions me

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    only the english language part of wikipedia is closing. So just find what you need on the french, german or spanish pages and run them through google translate
    You'd think with all those Hispanics, they would shut the Spanish one too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    only the english language part of wikipedia is closing. So just find what you need on the french, german or spanish pages and run them through google translate

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Easy, they can write a big story about how Wikipedia is shut instead
    It might be interesting to see what they come up with in other stories.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Easy, they can write a big story about how Wikipedia is shut instead

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Wikipedia going down for a day in protest, random individuals turning off their sites too (big deal), etc.
    I like this comment to the El Reg article:

    Journalists

    How the hell are any of Thursday's newspapers going to get content if professional, qualified, experienced Journalists can't paste copy from Wikipedia?!

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    The worst thing about it was that it involved breaking the Internet - not just tampering, but serious breakage using techniques more commonly used by China's Great Firewall, and in countries such as Iran. And to add insult to injury, the politicians promoting the act not only admitted they didn't have the faintest understanding of the technical issues, they actually boasted of it and took pride in their ignorance

    Dear Congress, It's No Longer OK To Not Know How The Internet Works | Motherboard

    SOPA Debate Highlights Congress's Ignorance - Miller-McCune

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X