- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Computer People?!?!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Computer People?!?!"
Collapse
-
one that you perhaps need to go on your self...
Originally posted by Emperor DalekIt's all education, education, education is my control room.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gold Dalekfeck is it pick on Gold Dalek day or something???
picky but correct....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostShe might have been the secretary to more than one agency, so agencies' might also be correct.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostYes.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostShe might have been the secretary to more than one agency, so agencies' might also be correct.
ZG in "Grocer's' apostrophe" mode.
Leave a comment:
-
CP approaches? Ignore and file in the round bin. Even if they get you a decent role the contract will be total rubbish and they'll screw you over margin, expenses and IR35. As for Leeds, who wants to be associated with the NHS fiasco anyway...?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fleetwoodagency's
picky but correct....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by snawfall within IR35 at the client insistence (No substition clause etc) - sounded kind of fishy to me so I told em no interest.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by snawCan't remember exact phrase used but basically they told me that two of the jobs would fall within IR35 at the client insistence (No substition clause etc) - sounded kind of fishy to me so I told em no interest.
Never had another agency insist on that with me before.
It wasn't so long ago that I sat down with an agencies secretary and effectively & retrospectively re-drew the contract to ensure it was outside IR35
Leave a comment:
-
you know the market is better than it was but it isn't fantastic, doesn't surprise me if you don't hear anything back. I looked a bit back, initially great kind of response but everything gets delayed and you do get the impression that clients are looking but they're not particularly urgent, you know "if we can't find someone we'll muddle through" attitude, rather than "sh*t we really need someone or will fall flat on our faces".
Leave a comment:
-
Can't remember exact phrase used but basically they told me that two of the jobs would fall within IR35 at the client insistence (No substition clause etc) - sounded kind of fishy to me so I told em no interest.
Never had another agency insist on that with me before.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by snawOh, did I mention they also insist on IR35 contracts only it appears ...
Leave a comment:
-
Computer People?!?!
Dum, de de dum, de de dum, de de dum, dum dum da daaaaa ....
What a complete and utter bunch of brokeback mountaineers, they have gone straight to the top of my "agencies to steer well clear of" list.
Finished a contract week before last, taking a few weeks out to prepare for the CCIE lab I got scheduled start of May and just started putting my CV out. Getting plenty of phone calls, at decent rates ... then there are Computer People ...
So far I've had about 6 different phone calls from their agents all over the country offering me jobs in God knows what kind of forsaken hell holes, depite being very clear to them that I'm looking in London only. One lady even told me that I couldn't be choosy this time of year when I said I wasn't interested in working in Leeds - this despite me getting more interest than a good looking hooker overlooking a prime window in Amsterdam atm.
The one guy from London who has contacted me rattled off four different Banks he was going to arrange interviews for me with, so me being nice said fine you can represent me and duly turned down another agent later who had a confirmed interview with one of them since I don't like crossing my wires - this was last Thursday and I still haven't heard back from him since first contact.
Kn0bs of the first order.
/rant over
Oh, did I mention they also insist on IR35 contracts only it appears ...Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Today 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Yesterday 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Yesterday 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
Leave a comment: