• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Alcohol more harmful than Heroin"

Collapse

  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Naturally enough, the Septics have banned its use even in hospitals.
    Was having a conversation with the missus about picking out malpracticing doctors by statistically reviewing their prescribing data. The conversation, as it always does on this subject, turned to Shipman who was allowed to get the same amount of Diamorphine hospitals were buying in over the course of many years, she has used it once in 16 years as a doctor.

    Leave a comment:


  • kandr
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    I believe also that most of the GIs who came back from Vietnam with a heroin problem kicked it without help once they no longer had the stress of combat to deal with.

    However, even if a drug is medically harmless that does not make it harmless for an individual or for society. Drugs can be a means of escape from problems and there is a danger in that because stress is not entirely a pointless thing, it is nature's way of telling us when we have problems and the ideal is to solve those problems. Continually resorting to the quick fix of drugs means that we make no progress.
    Preach it brother!

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    I believe also that most of the GIs who came back from Vietnam with a heroin problem kicked it without help once they no longer had the stress of combat to deal with.

    However, even if a drug is medically harmless that does not make it harmless for an individual or for society. Drugs can be a means of escape from problems and there is a danger in that because stress is not entirely a pointless thing, it is nature's way of telling us when we have problems and the ideal is to solve those problems. Continually resorting to the quick fix of drugs means that we make no progress.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boudica
    replied
    Has anyone seen Kristian F ? That scared the jesus out of me as a teenager, I've never even taken an eccy fearing I would be the one who died the first time they tried it!


    Geoffery Robertson did a show a few years ago about the best drug for your surgeon to be on, heroin, alcohol or barbs, he concluded heroin. I think he said the main dangers were the inconsistency of dose, what people did to get the drug and not eating properly as caused by lack of money. So if you had a consistent and clean and affordable supply the damage done to the body over a period of time is less.

    I have a couple of friends who have used for ten year periods and stopped without much damage, middle class professionals and all that....

    Leave a comment:


  • SizeZero
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Heroin is "dangerous" only because it's very addictive and you can overdose on it much easier than Alcohol, but it has no long term effects like Alcohol does, it doesn't ruin your liver.
    However, one side effect you missed is that it 'relaxes' you to the point where you stop breathing - if it manages to do that, the side effects are indeed negligible.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Diamorphine is addictive and you do get withdrawls.
    Its OK, BB simply takes the first random firings of his few neurons as being the gospel truth and goes from there.
    Evidence and facts don't come into it.

    Leave a comment:


  • kandr
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Diamorphine is addictive and you do get withdrawls.
    Was it like that trainspotting scene when you were coming off it?

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    That's why heroine (Diamorphine) is used in hospitals as a painkiller, rather than alcohol. Has very little harmful effects other than constipation and obviously being drowsy and generally you can't give a sh*t about anything. In fact when it's used for pain relief the patients don't even get addicted, there's no "cold turkey" when they come off it.
    Diamorphine is addictive and you do get withdrawls.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by RichardCranium View Post
    chav's truffles
    Is that a euphemism?

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by kandr View Post
    Ive only seen a few interviews, so perhaps you are right, nothing like a bottle of JD for the nerves.
    Of course in most of those recorded interviews he would have been full of "smack".

    Leave a comment:


  • kandr
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    So what's your chosen drug?
    Sniffing Petrol

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    So what's your chosen drug?

    Leave a comment:


  • kandr
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    I'm not sure a 70 year old who can still play guitar, give a great rock concert, write songs and write a biography (admittedly with the help of a ghost writer) is particularly "harmed".

    But yes he does sound bad sometimes. I remember a longtime ago Keith Richards being held up as the example as what drugs do to you, but he still kept going. I put it down to the fact that he drinks a bottle of Jack Daniels before his interviews and then he sounds slurred, and you assume he's always like that. Saw him in that film when he was organising Chuck Berry's 60th birthday concert, he was much sharper than he appears in the interviews.
    Ive only seen a few interviews, so perhaps you are right, nothing like a bottle of JD for the nerves.

    Leave a comment:


  • kandr
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    As opposed to CUK you mean?

    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    If a far larger percentage of the population used LSD, skunk cannabis or ectasy our hospitals would be full of schizophrenics and depressives
    As opposed to the House of Commons you mean?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X