• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The "No tulip Sherlock" news item of the day...."

Collapse

  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    But on the plus side has anyone noticed that, with minor exceptions like welfare fraud, you rarely see any really fat criminals? Most crime is by thin ugly people.
    But prison is an easy place to gain weight. Weird, huh?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Obquote from Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    Code:
    CAESAR
    
        Let me have men about me that are fat;
        Sleek-headed men and such as sleep o' nights:
        Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look;
        He thinks too much: such men are dangerous.
    
    ANTONY
    
        Fear him not, Caesar; he's not dangerous;
        He is a noble Roman and well given.
    
    CAESAR
    
        Would he were fatter! But I fear him not:
        Yet if my name were liable to fear,
        I do not know the man I should avoid
        So soon as that spare Cassius. He reads much;
        He is a great observer and he looks
        Quite through the deeds of men: he loves no plays,
        As thou dost, Antony; he hears no music;
        Seldom he smiles, and smiles in such a sort
        As if he mock'd himself and scorn'd his spirit
        That could be moved to smile at any thing.
        Such men as he be never at heart's ease
        Whiles they behold a greater than themselves,

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    But on the plus side has anyone noticed that, with minor exceptions like welfare fraud, you rarely see any really fat criminals? Most crime is by thin ugly people.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardCranium
    replied
    Rain causes rise in flood risk

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    If so, fat retarding forces must also exist. Otherwise fat people would just keep getting fatter, smellier and lazier.
    They do, one of which is called "a coronary".

    Hth.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    They would probably overheat at some point too, because their surface areas (and ability to dissipate heat) goes with girth squared, whereas mass goes with girth cubed. Though that does assume fat produces heat, whcih it probably doesn't if it isn't being burnt, which it won't be. Burning that fat (e.g. by exercising) might be deadly though.
    Wouldn't jiggling it cause kinetic energy to be turned into heat?

    I think you might have hit on the reason fat people don't like exercising. Even a sedate jog would be like running a marathon in a fat suit.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Well, at a first pass, I expect they would start to run out of food once they had eaten everything on the planet so they are unlikely to get much larger than a small space rock like, say, the moon.

    We can refine this upper bound by taking into account that there is only about 70 years or so for them to cram their chubby cheeks full of lard, which obviously limits the total amount of flubber they can amass, and there is a further self limiting mechanism as once they reach a radius comparable with the length of their arms they are unable to get close enough to the fridge to access it.
    They would probably overheat at some point too, because their surface areas (and ability to dissipate heat) goes with girth squared, whereas mass goes with girth cubed. Though that does assume fat produces heat, whcih it probably doesn't if it isn't being burnt, which it won't be. Burning that fat (e.g. by exercising) might be deadly though.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Well, I haven't yet seen fat people the size of the visible universe. Do you think this could be because of what they can physically stuff into their mouths? Oops, I accidentally mentioned food - which as every fat person knows bears no relationship with obesity.
    Well, at a first pass, I expect they would start to run out of food once they had eaten everything on the planet so they are unlikely to get much larger than a small space rock like, say, the moon.

    We can refine this upper bound by taking into account that there is only about 70 years or so for them to cram their chubby cheeks full of lard, which obviously limits the total amount of flubber they can amass, and there is a further self limiting mechanism as once they reach a radius comparable with the length of their arms they are unable to get close enough to the fridge to access it.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Have you any evidence that they dont?
    They appear to be self limiting in the same way that the size of insects is limited to a certain level by the nature of their anatomy. You keep getting fatter until you reach a certain point, at which point you drop (ok, maybe not drop, slump? ) dead.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Have you any evidence that they dont?
    Well, I haven't yet seen fat people the size of the visible universe. Do you think this could be because of what they can physically stuff into their mouths? Oops, I accidentally mentioned food - which as every fat person knows bears no relationship with obesity.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    If so, fat retarding forces must also exist. Otherwise fat people would just keep getting fatter, smellier and lazier.
    Have you any evidence that they dont?

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    I suspect it works both ways to create a positive feedback loop.
    If so, fat retarding forces must also exist. Otherwise fat people would just keep getting fatter, smellier and lazier.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    The question is, does indolence make you fat or does fatness make you indolent?
    I suspect it works both ways to create a positive feedback loop.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    The paper says there is no disputing the association between physical activity and body fat.
    In other words fat people are lazy. The question is, does indolence make you fat or does fatness make you indolent? The paper suggests the latter. I hope this research was carried out by thin people who went the extra mile.

    We also need to know which way around it works for body aroma. Does being smelly make you fat?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Hang on - Aren't they _querying_ the notion that lack of exercise causes obesity?

    So it's not so much a "no tulip Sherlock" article but more of a "Good grief, Holmes, you amaze me" one

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X