- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Since we're doing dumb physics/maths questions..."
Collapse
-
I'd go with the stick it in the water pointing backwards idea but how far are a few batteries going to take you anyway? Probably best to chuck them overboard and reduce the pointless weight.
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostIt's outside the scenario - this is a pure physics problem rather than a lateral thinking one - but yes in reality that would be quite effective, if rather tiring. You're translating biological (chemical) energy into kinetic energy to move the sail, effectively 'rowing' the boat with a 'paddle' in the air.
Leave a comment:
-
Feck all your high powered physics malarky.
If it were me and I wasn't allowed to point it at myself I would.
Stick it on the front and mount it backwards at a 45 degree angle pointing it towards the mast.
This will provide backwards thrust from the fan and also will allow the sail form as an aero foil and generate motion from that effect.
The sail will have drag but not 1:1 with the air pushed so it'll move the boat.
Leave a comment:
-
It's outside the scenario - this is a pure physics problem rather than a lateral thinking one - but yes in reality that would be quite effective, if rather tiring. You're translating biological (chemical) energy into kinetic energy to move the sail, effectively 'rowing' the boat with a 'paddle' in the air.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostPut it on the back (stern) of the boat, pointing backwards (astern) so it pushes air out behind the boat. Additionally, take the sail down.
It's because of Newton's 3rd law, but I won't spoil the thread completely by explaining the reasoning just yet.
Leave a comment:
-
Put it on the back (stern) of the boat, pointing backwards (astern) so it pushes air out behind the boat. Additionally, take the sail down.
It's because of Newton's 3rd law, but I won't spoil the thread completely by explaining the reasoning just yet.
Leave a comment:
-
given my previous lack of success with these damn questions I should leave well alone but I am glutton for punishment so here goes.
1) You could in effect use it to blow wind into the sail - I cannot see a problem with this. So point it foward.
2) It may be more efficent to point it back wards - either above the water so it acts like a hovercraft/swamp boat fan - but these tend to be quite large - so you may have more joy pointing it backwards in the water so it acts as a propeller.
3) I am sure the Benoulli principle will work also
As to which is going to be the best of the 3 options - I would go for using it as a propeller!
Come on someone come up with the correct answer to put me out of my misery!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by threaded View PostOh this should be a fun thread, because I actually tested this, (in a Physics laboratory no less,) so know the answer.
Leave a comment:
-
There's a reason I'm not an IT contractor - yes - these guys are on the tip of the sword there's no way I could wrestle with that kind of intellect.
Leave a comment:
-
Let me throw something in here (just to stir it up a bit more) - a helicopter works doesn't it? It has no sail underneath the rotor blades. If it did, it would not fly.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostOut the aft (assuming you want to go forwards).
I guess the obvious answer is to point it at the sail, but that can't work as the sail is attached to the boat, and the fan is (effectively) attatched to the boat too. The best thing you can do with the sail is take it down to remove any drag.
The air isn't attached to anything is it?
You are best leaving the sail up.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: