• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Want to know how much Hector has earned from IR35?"

Collapse

  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Highlighting the small amounts raked in by IR35 compliance investigations could backfire if, God forbid, Labour squeeked in yet again at the next election, in that it could prompt public and parliamentary support for more stringent rules.

    For example, isn't there some proposed new rule that dividends from a company should be taxed under PAYE if more than 50% of the company's profits derive from services performed in person by its directors? Sorry if this is well-known and has been kicked around here for years.

    P.S. In the present economic climate even the Tories might be tempted to do something similar.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Bloggs
    replied
    The HMRC scare tactics work. There's three staff blokes here who are ex-contractors and they're always itching to bring the conversation round to IR35 and the risks involved. It justifies to them their decision to go staff status.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    I suggest nobody talks to Dim for using the phrase "hard working people" without sneering.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    See my earlier post. I make it around £150m a year. Even if I'm out by a factor of 5, which I don't think I am, it's still less than they were predicting they would get.
    Yes, I remember Dawn's £900 million.

    The original post read as though it was comparing an actual £9.2 million with an expected £220 million per year, which I'm sure you didn't mean but it was inadvertently misleading.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Wait a minute, that is wrong.

    £9.2 million is only the amount gained from compliance activities (the IR/HMRC investigations into individuals).

    IR35 has actually earned the government more than 100 times that, from contractors who simply ticked the box and rolled over, or joined umbrellas.

    It is still proving to be an earner.
    See my earlier post. I make it around £150m a year. Even if I'm out by a factor of 5, which I don't think I am, it's still less than they were predicting they would get.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Wait a minute, that is wrong.
    Good Lord - the PCG putting around scare stories and iffy stats? Never!

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Bloggs
    replied
    They must pick up 00's of millions from brolly users who would have been using Ltd Co's if IR35 wasn't there. I should think IR35 scare tactics are a nice little earner for them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    £9.2 million.

    That's not every year, that's from when it started... when, incidentally, they were expecting to get £220m a year just from the extra NICs

    Good to know they got their sums right, isn't it...
    Wait a minute, that is wrong.

    £9.2 million is only the amount gained from compliance activities (the IR/HMRC investigations into individuals).

    IR35 has actually earned the government more than 100 times that, from contractors who simply ticked the box and rolled over, or joined umbrellas.

    It is still proving to be an earner.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pickle2
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post


    cock.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by Pickle2 View Post
    Posts: 12,084


    cock.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pickle2
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    It's not a tax based on making the revenue money, it's a spiteful Socalist tax attacking hard working people who most likely don't vote Labour. Simples.
    Posts: 12,084

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    Figure from where Mal?

    Does that include people who changed their pay structure as they felt IR35 caught or is it just the income from cases resolved?
    PCG PRess release (and it's on their website now as well).

    I think it's direct income. However I did some guesstimateson the guys who pay IR35 anyway (or use brollies) and I made it around £150m a year all told, way under the original projections.
    Last edited by malvolio; 21 May 2009, 14:04.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    No idea. Even if we stick with the 1460 won cases at say £20k each plus manpower costs, probably in the order of £40m...

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    £9.2 million.

    That's not every year, that's from when it started... when, incidentally, they were expecting to get £220m a year just from the extra NICs

    Good to know they got their sums right, isn't it...
    Figure from where Mal?

    Does that include people who changed their pay structure as they felt IR35 caught or is it just the income from cases resolved?

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    How much has it cost them in time, legal fees etc?

    It's not a tax based on making the revenue money, it's a spiteful Socalist tax attacking hard working people who most likely don't vote Labour. Simples.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X