Highlighting the small amounts raked in by IR35 compliance investigations could backfire if, God forbid, Labour squeeked in yet again at the next election, in that it could prompt public and parliamentary support for more stringent rules.
For example, isn't there some proposed new rule that dividends from a company should be taxed under PAYE if more than 50% of the company's profits derive from services performed in person by its directors? Sorry if this is well-known and has been kicked around here for years.
P.S. In the present economic climate even the Tories might be tempted to do something similar.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Want to know how much Hector has earned from IR35?"
Collapse
-
The HMRC scare tactics work. There's three staff blokes here who are ex-contractors and they're always itching to bring the conversation round to IR35 and the risks involved. It justifies to them their decision to go staff status.
Leave a comment:
-
I suggest nobody talks to Dim for using the phrase "hard working people" without sneering.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, I remember Dawn's £900 million.Originally posted by malvolio View PostSee my earlier post. I make it around £150m a year. Even if I'm out by a factor of 5, which I don't think I am, it's still less than they were predicting they would get.
The original post read as though it was comparing an actual £9.2 million with an expected £220 million per year, which I'm sure you didn't mean but it was inadvertently misleading.
Leave a comment:
-
See my earlier post. I make it around £150m a year. Even if I'm out by a factor of 5, which I don't think I am, it's still less than they were predicting they would get.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostWait a minute, that is wrong.
£9.2 million is only the amount gained from compliance activities (the IR/HMRC investigations into individuals).
IR35 has actually earned the government more than 100 times that, from contractors who simply ticked the box and rolled over, or joined umbrellas.
It is still proving to be an earner.
Leave a comment:
-
They must pick up 00's of millions from brolly users who would have been using Ltd Co's if IR35 wasn't there. I should think IR35 scare tactics are a nice little earner for them.
Leave a comment:
-
Wait a minute, that is wrong.Originally posted by malvolio View Post£9.2 million.
That's not every year, that's from when it started... when, incidentally, they were expecting to get £220m a year just from the extra NICs
Good to know they got their sums right, isn't it...

£9.2 million is only the amount gained from compliance activities (the IR/HMRC investigations into individuals).
IR35 has actually earned the government more than 100 times that, from contractors who simply ticked the box and rolled over, or joined umbrellas.
It is still proving to be an earner.
Leave a comment:
-
PCG PRess release (and it's on their website now as well).Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostFigure from where Mal?
Does that include people who changed their pay structure as they felt IR35 caught or is it just the income from cases resolved?
I think it's direct income. However I did some guesstimateson the guys who pay IR35 anyway (or use brollies) and I made it around £150m a year all told, way under the original projections.Last edited by malvolio; 21 May 2009, 14:04.
Leave a comment:
-
No idea. Even if we stick with the 1460 won cases at say £20k each plus manpower costs, probably in the order of £40m...
Leave a comment:
-
Figure from where Mal?Originally posted by malvolio View Post£9.2 million.
That's not every year, that's from when it started... when, incidentally, they were expecting to get £220m a year just from the extra NICs
Good to know they got their sums right, isn't it...
Does that include people who changed their pay structure as they felt IR35 caught or is it just the income from cases resolved?
Leave a comment:
-
How much has it cost them in time, legal fees etc?
It's not a tax based on making the revenue money, it's a spiteful Socalist tax attacking hard working people who most likely don't vote Labour. Simples.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Leave a comment: