• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The Bank of England "prints" money"

Collapse

  • MPwannadecentincome
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    I just agreed a new contract at 20% higher than anything else I have right now, in $USD, so as far as I'm concerned... DIVE, POUND, DIVE!!!


    Originally posted by chef View Post
    paid in EUR's

    i'll just sit back with my weissbeir and watch the pound fall down down down


    keep up the exports!

    Leave a comment:


  • chef
    replied
    paid in EUR's

    i'll just sit back with my weissbeir and watch the pound fall down down down

    Leave a comment:


  • oracleslave
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Yes, and the reason is that debt has to be borrowed with interest, and that is a deterrent to more and more debt. Once you start creating money you are heading down a very dangerous road like Zimbabwe, but this HMG obviously do not care about future consequences, only short-term votes.
    Some Zimbabweans are doing just fine

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle5734148.ece

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    Mmmmmmmmm, Errrrrr. No.

    Yes, and the reason is that debt has to be borrowed with interest, and that is a deterrent to more and more debt. Once you start creating money you are heading down a very dangerous road like Zimbabwe, but this HMG obviously do not care about future consequences, only short-term votes.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    They should have cut public spending years ago. That's one reason we are in such a mess. Still better to issue debt than increase the money supply and cause hyper-inflation
    Mmmmmmmmm, Errrrrr. No.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    I just agreed a new contract at 20% higher than anything else I have right now, in $USD, so as far as I'm concerned... DIVE, POUND, DIVE!!!


    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    So long as they cut public spending as well otherwise they would have to issue debt. If they didn't do that then they might find that they only people left to borrow from would be the Bank of England and they get their money by ......


    They should have cut public spending years ago. That's one reason we are in such a mess. Still better to issue debt than increase the money supply and cause hyper-inflation.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Instead of pumping money into the system, which will eventually cause inflation, HMG should have considered tax cuts to enable consumers to have more disposable income.
    So long as they cut public spending as well otherwise they would have to issue debt. If they didn't do that then they might find that they only people left to borrow from would be the Bank of England and they get their money by ......

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Don't be silly. They're socialists.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Instead of pumping money into the system, which will eventually cause inflation, HMG should have considered tax cuts to enable consumers to have more disposable income.

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    Plus the use of the non-word "incentivise".
    Good spot Sysman, but my eyeballs were screaming before I could get to that part of the sentence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
    I'm sorry but I find your overly-long username, and your insistence on the particularly naff, Georgia serif type face (at a tiny point size), eliminates all meaningful content from your posts.
    Plus the use of the non-word "incentivise".

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Originally posted by MPwannadecentincome View Post
    What the govt/bank really needs to be doing is pumping money into small service businesses to incentivise exports.

    I would vote for tax breaks for selling my services abroad, e.g. for every EUR or USD invoice raised to a genuine foreign customer I would willingly drop my rate to that customer if the tax break covered the drop - just to drum up more export business. In addition help and guidance with export issues and marketing would be of great assistance. Finally having access to some sales people paid for by govt would top the icing on the cake.

    This would put money in pockets across the board in a range of service industries, in some cases this would encourage employment hence confidence and spending, which improves the govt's tax collection, VAT collection and reduces benefit payments.

    Why sink money into banks when small businesses are responsive and agile enough to take up the challenge?
    I'm sorry but I find your overly-long username, and your insistence on the particularly naff, Georgia serif type face (at a tiny point size), eliminates all meaningful content from your posts.

    Leave a comment:


  • MPwannadecentincome
    replied
    What the govt/bank really needs to be doing is pumping money into small service businesses to incentivise exports.

    I would vote for tax breaks for selling my services abroad, e.g. for every EUR or USD invoice raised to a genuine foreign customer I would willingly drop my rate to that customer if the tax break covered the drop - just to drum up more export business. In addition help and guidance with export issues and marketing would be of great assistance. Finally having access to some sales people paid for by govt would top the icing on the cake.

    This would put money in pockets across the board in a range of service industries, in some cases this would encourage employment hence confidence and spending, which improves the govt's tax collection, VAT collection and reduces benefit payments.

    Why sink money into banks when small businesses are responsive and agile enough to take up the challenge?
    Last edited by MPwannadecentincome; 16 February 2009, 20:55. Reason: This default font is sooooooooooooo boring

    Leave a comment:


  • b0redom
    replied
    Is no one else worried that Mr Bean is the Bank of England’s deputy governor?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X