Originally posted by Benny
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: The FaQQer: Where'd He Go?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "The FaQQer: Where'd He Go?"
Collapse
-
Leave a comment:
-
I just recall that threads were deleted and warnings given for disagreeing with mods' decision - but it was a long time ago.
Leave a comment:
-
You can argue if you want. You just have to be very sure of your facts. The moderation has been fairly low key anyway, and AFAICR only one person has ever been banned, many years ago. The Ts&Cs are very clear on what is unacceptable behaviour.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostIt used to be you weren't allowed to argue with mods over there. Is that still the case? You could try it and see what happens.
That said, I think the moderation balance on here is better, but the two are not really comparable environments.
Leave a comment:
-
It used to be you weren't allowed to argue with mods over there. Is that still the case? You could try it and see what happens.Originally posted by Alias View PostDon't think so, plenty of warnings/points given tho so doubt it would be long...
Leave a comment:
-
Nah. That was early 2009Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostIs that about when the quality of advice of the professional forums improved?
Leave a comment:
-
Ok ok.. Not that muchOriginally posted by Alias View PostUse the other forum then, he's quite active on it (being a Mod on it, I suppose he would have to be)
Leave a comment:
-
Is that about when the quality of advice of the professional forums improved?Originally posted by malvolio View PostWhich also explains his absence form here. Older members may recall I vanished for a while in 2008 for the same reason.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Today 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Yesterday 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51


Leave a comment: