Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
No matter what you think or try to do, the fact that you were asked says a lot.
It means they are thinking you are replacable and they want to lower costs.
They are just sounding you out first - your choice of course.
Actually it could mean the opposite - that they think you are irreplaceable and don't ever want to lose you. Also they see it as a priviledge that you're being asked to join their ranks, and hence would only ask if they value you enough.
Two weeks after being offered an extension into 2009, I just got asked if I'd be interested in going permie.
I think that may have made my mind up about whether to take the renewal or not...
No matter what you think or try to do, the fact that you were asked says a lot.
It means they are thinking you are replacable and they want to lower costs.
They are just sounding you out first - your choice of course.
I suspect they'll wait until the project is largely complete so there's a clean break.... but this clearly creates a disincentive to be efficient surely? Goes against the grain a bit, but needs must in the current arid contracting climate.
Ditto. VeryLargeClientCo are adopting a "replace contractors with permies" policy across the board.
They're trying to do this from the very top of the management ladder here. The manager of this department is pushing back strongly on the basis that contractors and permies have different mindsets and therefore fulfil different requirements.
He's arguing that contractors tend to be better at fast delivery without faffing around, and permies are better suited to long-term infrastructure development and weaker at delivery. I'd tend to agree.
Ditto. VeryLargeClientCo are adopting a "replace contractors with permies" policy across the board. Plan is to offer a permie role to the competant contractors and ditch the fodder. So I'm real trouble
Plan is to make myself absolutely indispensible. Any suggestions? Currently deleting all the project documentation so it's all in my head only
Last year I rejected an "offer" to go permanent. Subsequently I had to show my replacement the ropes. He started on Monday and ran away midday Friday saying that there was too much SAS Development. The role had been advertised as "SAS Developer"
Oh dear. Had a little search on Jobswerve this evening, it's a bit quiet out there and rates seem a bit tulip compared to last time I was looking
I'm OK so far, touch wood; but if there isn't enough perl or .Net around when I start looking, it may mean having to fall back on the doomsday option of including php in the search.
Trouble is php rates are rubbish at the best of times, and I'd be practically paying the client to work if it's as bad now as people are saying. (I haven't dared check jobsworth for months.)
Leave a comment: