"Assembly" has been hijacked!
What gets me is that Microsoft writes another layer of abstraction that is a runtime environment (.Net framework) that runs in the OS runtime environment (User-mode Windows), that runs on top of the Windows Kernel which talks to the HAL, that finally then runs on the hardware...
... and they call it an Assembly! How dare they!
Now the word is used to mean two complete opposites, and you watch the younger generation turning up for work-experience with no clue on the real meaning of 'Assembly'.
Never mind. I can fight back. Every meeting with the coders, I get to laugh each time someone says ".Net assembly". When they ask, I say, "If you don't get it, then don't worry!".
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Thud thud thud thud thud thud
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Thud thud thud thud thud thud"
Collapse
-
For x = 0 to x+1
Print "RA"x" EQU "x;
Next x
or something?
(I could do it in COBOL, but that would take a few more lines...)
Leave a comment:
-
I miss assembly language... haven't done anything much with it since writing some fast graphics, animation and 3D rendering routines for the ARM on the Archimedes in the early nineties.
How are the mighty fallen...
Leave a comment:
-
Nor will most of the programs written by students for them!Originally posted by Churchill View PostBecause how can you expect to be a real engineer if you don't fully understand the processes involved?
To the best of my knowledge, .NEt won't run on a PIC.
Why can't it be done in an emulator? Would save a lot of faff and you still learn the principles.
Leave a comment:
-
I seem to remember those from my uni days (Electronic Engineering).
Good job I don't have anything to do with them these days...
Leave a comment:
-
I know...Originally posted by zeitghostIt is, as the dog said, an engineering degree...
We engineers (an me in particular) seem to spend quite a lot of time bit fiddling in assembler.
Though it must be said that the PIC is a curiously unfriendly device with a peculiarly odd assembly language syntax.

Leave a comment:
-
Because how can you expect to be a real engineer if you don't fully understand the processes involved?Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostWhy is this stuff still being taught? Or is the course title something like "Really old computer systems and how to cock about with them"?
To the best of my knowledge, .NEt won't run on a PIC.
Leave a comment:
-
Why is this stuff still being taught? Or is the course title something like "Really old computer systems and how to cock about with them"?
Leave a comment:
-
I think it is some sort of assembler code. Early man used to use that sort of thing on their abacuses.
Leave a comment:
-
I have no idea what you are on about. Doesn't mean it's not simple though.Originally posted by zeitghost View PostThat's the noise of me banging my head on the desk...
What's so difficult about
RA0 EQU 0
RA1 EQU 1
etc.?
Leave a comment:
-
Thud thud thud thud thud thud
That's the noise of me banging my head on the desk...
What's so difficult about
RA0 EQU 0
RA1 EQU 1
etc.?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Yesterday 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: