• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Foreigners commit fifth of crime in London"

Collapse

  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    London is a Darwinian community and only the fittest survive
    If London may be likened to a compost heap, and I think it can, then you would be the biggest weed growing out of it sg.

    Leave a comment:


  • DBA_bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Rich barrow boys, rich pretentious arrogant snobs, rich foreign criminals.
    London is a Darwinian community and only the fittest survive. Lesser mortals have to move away or stay away.
    Londoners are just higher on the evolutionary ladder than the rest of humanity.

    HTH
    You haven't walked from Crouch End to Holloway, recently, then? Now that really is like descending the evolutionary ladder, step by step!

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Well if foreigners are going to commit crime in Britain I can think of no better place to do it. The place is full of barrow-boys and pretentious arrogant snobs anyway, aside from the prodigiously busy foreign criminal communities of course.
    Rich barrow boys, rich pretentious arrogant snobs, rich foreign criminals.
    London is a Darwinian community and only the fittest survive. Lesser mortals have to move away or stay away.
    Londoners are just higher on the evolutionary ladder than the rest of humanity.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Well if foreigners are going to commit crime in Britain I can think of no better place to do it. The place is full of barrow-boys and pretentious arrogant snobs anyway, aside from the prodigiously busy foreign criminal communities of course.

    Leave a comment:


  • DBA_bloke
    replied
    "Foreigners commit fifth of crime in London"

    ... good to see that Brits are doing the lion's share of crime, though.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    British crime for British criminals

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by kingshuk View Post
    Fair enough and a good point.

    But the original post and the usual headlines (for example - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.../ncrime123.xml
    ) create an impression (possibly that is the intention) that foreigners commit a disproportionately large number of crimes.
    So you would be happier if the Telegraphs headline was 'Foreigners only commit a fifth of crime in London' ?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    20% by non UK nationals

    Foreign national, not Foreign born. The story suggests that 20% of crimes are committed by people that are not UK citizens, regardless of ethnicity, so showing the number of Ethnic minorities the majority of which may well be UK citizens is irrelevant.

    "20% of crime is caused by visitors to the UK and people applying for citizenship" would be a more sensible statement. That to my mind is high. This probably has nothing to do with ethnicity and more with the kind of people that we attract by lax immigration enforcement.

    If they were all Australians or Americans comitting the crime none of the usual suspects would be defending the figures.
    Last edited by vetran; 25 September 2007, 00:33.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by Clippy View Post
    Another classic Troll post.

    Nice technique you have going there
    You mean like this?

    http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...-services.html

    Leave a comment:


  • oloks
    replied
    The Prophecies of Enoch Powell

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by Francko View Post
    The controls are there. However, since UK is part of EU you cannot stop people entering your country unless they pose a serious threat at an international level. Not sure that more control would somehow improve the situation. What can be useful though is a better cooperation among EU states police so that people can be tracked more easily from one country to another. I guess many people feel free to commit crime in UK because when they return to their countries there is no track of what they have done.
    It's true that you cannot control movement throughout the EU - it works for UK nationals going to Spain etc and if you buy into the notion of an integrated union you cannot really complain.
    But what about the rest, were they allowed in on FTV, Work permits, asylum?
    One of the Labours arguments for large scale immigration is the economic benifit it supposedly brings.... interesting that we are now getting the figures to suggest that this may not always be the case

    Leave a comment:


  • kingshuk
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Even if it was 20% committing 20% that is not the point, we are stuck with our criminals, we have no duty to take in other people's and proper controls should ensure as far as possible that unsuitable people are not admitted.
    Fair enough and a good point.

    But the original post and the usual headlines (for example - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.../ncrime123.xml
    ) create an impression (possibly that is the intention) that foreigners commit a disproportionately large number of crimes.

    Many are unlikely to wonder about London's demographics at this point. Of course most such articles will not mention the percentage of foreigners in London either.

    Its also easy to leap into conclusion based on statistically insignifcant numbers - especially when they are presented in nice tabular format.
    For example of the 263 sex offences committed by foreigners in London between Jan to June 2007 the chinese committed none and hence?

    Leave a comment:


  • Clippy
    replied
    Another classic Troll post.

    Nice technique you have going there

    Leave a comment:


  • Francko
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Even if it was 20% committing 20% that is not the point, we are stuck with our criminals, we have no duty to take in other people's and proper controls should ensure as far as possible that unsuitable people are not admitted.
    The controls are there. However, since UK is part of EU you cannot stop people entering your country unless they pose a serious threat at an international level. Not sure that more control would somehow improve the situation. What can be useful though is a better cooperation among EU states police so that people can be tracked more easily from one country to another. I guess many people feel free to commit crime in UK because when they return to their countries there is no track of what they have done.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Even if it was 20% committing 20% that is not the point, we are stuck with our criminals, we have no duty to take in other people's and proper controls should ensure as far as possible that unsuitable people are not admitted.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X