Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
So it appears it's just an (underground) land grab. Already in litigation about use of the building so they decided to tunnel out to make more room. Very strange carry on.
Was hoping it was much more sinister and interesting but it's not.
Very strange. What is it about the tunnel that has them so worked up? Throughout the article they say the meaning of the tunnel is unclear but they are clearly passionate about it. Is it because it's the link to the 'womens baths' even though it also says it's unused? Can't help thinking there is something pretty dark about this but could be totally wrong.
Very strange. What is it about the tunnel that has them so worked up? Throughout the article they say the meaning of the tunnel is unclear but they are clearly passionate about it. Is it because it's the link to the 'womens baths' even though it also says it's unused? Can't help thinking there is something pretty dark about this but could be totally wrong.
Leave a comment: