Originally posted by sadkingbilly
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: ROFL
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "ROFL"
Collapse
-
the museum's in Aalborg, the artist is Danish, so what's feckin Dutch law to do withit??Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
Either click the link or read the story elsewhere.
The story is all over the news.
Leave a comment:
-
Of course. The museum just comes across like a dick.Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
Under English and Welsh law maybe, but not necessarily under Dutch law.
Leave a comment:
-
wots Dutch law got to do with it?Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
Under English and Welsh law maybe, but not necessarily under Dutch law.
Leave a comment:
-
Under English and Welsh law maybe, but not necessarily under Dutch law.Originally posted by JustKeepSwimming View PostSo the museum director thought it was funny and saw the message of the work and decided to display it?
Assume the contract was specific to what it was asking for, money in the frame, then sure it's a breach of contract but IMO the museum decision to hang the artwork is them accepting the breach.
Leave a comment:
-
So the museum director thought it was funny and saw the message of the work and decided to display it?
Assume the contract was specific to what it was asking for, money in the frame, then sure it's a breach of contract but IMO the museum decision to hang the artwork is them accepting the breach.
Leave a comment:
-
ROFL
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...000-given.html
Artist who supplied museum with two blank canvasses for project named 'Take the Money and Run' is ordered to repay the £58,000 he was given- Jens Haaning, 58, was supposed to use the cash as part of an artwork for display
- Instead museum staff faced empty canvasses when he revealed his work
Must have been a contractorTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Leave a comment: