Can we do a Begum on him?

[NotAllThere]

NAT has a few...

When I went bald, at least the ginger cross was dealt with.

[SueEllen]

NAT has a few...

As NAT says -

He Ain't Heavy, He's My Brother

[vetran]

You are well aware that everyone has their own cross to bear.

NAT has a few...

[SueEllen]

He's ginger as well.

You are well aware that everyone has their own cross to bear.

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

you'd be doing him a favour.

[vetran]

doing well in court so far today.

Apparently the papers hacked his mobile before he even had one...


https://news.sky.com/story/prince-ha...ditor-12881275

Harry's timeline in dispute - as lawyer says he did not have mobile phone in 1996


Andrew Green KC is now arguing that Prince Harry's phone could not have been hacked when one of the articles was published as he did not have a mobile phone at the time.

He says Harry was first given a mobile phone when he went to Eton in 1998 - but the article, titled "Diana so sad", was written in 1996.

Asked whether he had a mobile at the time the article was written, Harry indicates he can't remember for sure as it was "years ago".

Mr Green says if Harry didn't have a mobile at the time, it could not have been hacked by an MGN journalist.

But Harry says his mother, Princess Diana, would call him while he was at Eton using a landline phone.

The barrister says this still meant a journalist had not hacked his mobile.

"I can't be sure," Harry says.

Mr Green says Harry did not identify in his witness statement anyone else's phone who could have been hacked to gain information for the article.

oh dear!

[NotAllThere]

Or he's a whiny little bitch that's served his country which makes things a bit more complicated.

He's ginger as well.

[northernladuk]

On what grounds? Serving his country with honour or being a whiny little bitch?

Or he's a whiny little bitch that's served his country which makes things a bit more complicated.

[NotAllThere]

On what grounds? Serving his country with honour or being a whiny little bitch?

The latter.

[ladymuck]

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/01/u...ntl/index.html




oops!

I recall hearing some noise about this a while ago. I guess it's finally getting to court

[vetran]

He certainly more deserving of a Begum than Begum.

On what grounds? Serving his country with honour or being a whiny little bitch?

[SueEllen]

He certainly more deserving of a Begum than Begum.

Didn't his Granny have the option of sending him on endless tours banishing him to certain commonwealth countries in the Southern Hemisphere?

[NotAllThere]

He certainly more deserving of a Begum than Begum.

[vetran]

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/01/u...ntl/index.html

Harry, Duke of Sussex, pictured in March 2023.Henry Nicholls/ReutersCNN —
Prince Harry’s US immigration records should be unsealed in the light of revelations about drug-taking in his recent book, a conservative think tank will argue in a federal court next week.

The Heritage Foundation is suing the US government to find out if it acted according to procedure when it granted the Duke of Sussex a US visa. Under US immigration law, evidence of past drug use can be grounds to reject an application.

oops!