• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Are we about to go to war against Russia?"

Collapse

  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    The ‘urgent meeting’ was with the shop steward of Tory MPs, Sir Graham Brady.

    Who knows of what they spoke…
    Except Graham Brady was in the House of Commons at the time that she was supposedly meeting him.
    https://twitter.com/evolvepolitics/s...51924144140292

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Truss Lies!

    Leave a comment:


  • saptastic
    replied
    Originally posted by saptastic View Post
    Liz Truss today: We are now at war with Russia.

    Liz Truss tomorrow: We have appointed a new defence secretary and decided that we are reversing the decision to go to war. We are now not at war with Russia.


    And I apologise to the country as I never realised my actions of war declaration would impact the markets.
    Nobody made me aware that the markets would react neagtively or there was any correlation between my policies and the markets.
    But I took swift action in surrender so that I can focus on our energy policy.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by saptastic View Post
    Liz Truss today: We are now at war with Russia.

    Liz Truss tomorrow: We have appointed a new defence secretary and decided that we are reversing the decision to go to war. We are now not at war with Russia.

    Liz Truss Thursday: Baron Lebedev has accepted my unconditional surrender.

    Leave a comment:


  • saptastic
    replied
    Liz Truss today: We are now at war with Russia.

    Liz Truss tomorrow: We have appointed a new defence secretary and decided that we are reversing the decision to go to war. We are now not at war with Russia.


    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Given Russia has escalated attacks against Ukraine following the bridge attack, this seems like the sort of thing we would expect?
    Unfortunately, yes. Escalation is how he does it. Severe escalation would be a tactical nuke in Ukraine and NATO has already warned that it would invoke a severe response of some kind, while being constructively ambiguous, and it's hard to see that as something other than military (what sanctions are left?). Mining of undersea infrastructure would be another severe escalation.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Given Russia has escalated attacks against Ukraine following the bridge attack, this seems like the sort of thing we would expect?

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Gulp.

    Ben Wallace has hastily cancelled an early afternoon appearance before the Commons defence committee for an urgent trip to Washington DC, prompting speculation as to the purpose of the visit.

    James Heappey, a defence minister, said “my boss Ben Wallace is in Washington this morning” in an interview in Sky News and offered a cryptic explanation of his presence there. He suggested that Wallace would be having “the sort of conversations” that had to take place face to face.

    Heappey also said that the MoD was doing “a good job keeping our nation safe at a time of incredible global insecurity” – although it was unclear exactly what he may been referring to.

    A day earlier, questions were raised after a beleaguered Liz Truss did not appear in the Commons to handle an urgent question about the conduct of her government. Penny Mordaunt, deputising, had told MPs she had a “genuine reason” for not being present – but the reason was not explained and it is not clear if it is related to Wallace’s sudden travel.

    Wallace had been due to take questions from the committee on a range of issues, including political engagement with the US administration on military operations, the W93 nuclear missile and US protectionism and export controls.
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics...olitics-latest

    Leave a comment:


  • Unix
    replied
    Ben Wallace has hastily cancelled an early afternoon appearance before the Commons defence committee for an urgent trip to Washington DC, prompting speculation as to the purpose of the sudden visit.

    Leave a comment:


  • quackhandle
    replied
    CUK Christmas meetup will be a hoot.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	328277.jpg
Views:	172
Size:	85.0 KB
ID:	4237716
    qh

    Leave a comment:


  • Unix
    replied
    Originally posted by David71 View Post
    More importantly, what would be the effect on the contracting market?
    After the fall out think of all the new systems need building

    Leave a comment:


  • quackhandle
    replied
    Originally posted by David71 View Post
    More importantly, what would be the effect on the contracting market?
    Contract work on the front line?

    They'd blanket it all inside and still expect you to bring your own rifle and grenades.

    qh

    Leave a comment:


  • David71
    replied
    More importantly, what would be the effect on the contracting market?

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    THere is not a single chance anyone is going to declare war on Russia unless a)they are attacked first b)Russia starts nuking people.

    It's entirely possible very real conversations about b) are ongoing but given the bungle Liz has made of a simple mini-budget, can you imagine her at the helm of war-time Britain?

    Unless of course her glazed bumbling is because she knows this is coming.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDude
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Your thoughts?
    Personally, I think yes we are. We're reigning in our spending, the PM has twice been away from the house today on "urgent business"...
    It really wouldn't surprise me if factions in the US advocate taking Russia out whilst they are at their weakest.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X