Tory Rebel Scum: The Hunt

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

SueEllen replied

10 June 2022, 18:51
Originally posted by AtW View Post

And that is a problem for Boris how?

It won't because he will destroy the Tory party before he's gone.
Leave a comment:
AtW replied

10 June 2022, 15:33
Originally posted by SueEllen View Post

That will be everyone then except cock sucker Dorries and Rees-Smug.

And that is a problem for Boris how?
Leave a comment:
mattster replied

10 June 2022, 11:01
Originally posted by d000hg View Post

I'm sure I read in pre-vote analysis that if Boris got around 150 no-votes, this implied ministers were voting against him. At 148, how many of those talking him up in public voted him down do we think?
And has he got some sort of secret network of spies trying to find out... infiltrating anti-Boris groups and so on? Or is that just TV.

I think it implies that either some ministers were voting against him or that fully 75% of backbenchers were (and ministers perhaps only voting for him to keep their jobs). Neither is sustainable in my view.
Leave a comment:
d000hg replied

10 June 2022, 10:57
Originally posted by SueEllen View Post

So Gove wants Hunt to lose his seat?

Without the 148 back benchers the Tory party won't be in government.

I'm sure I read in pre-vote analysis that if Boris got around 150 no-votes, this implied ministers were voting against him. At 148, how many of those talking him up in public voted him down do we think?
And has he got some sort of secret network of spies trying to find out... infiltrating anti-Boris groups and so on? Or is that just TV.
Leave a comment:
SueEllen replied

10 June 2022, 08:05
Originally posted by AtW View Post

It will be if all MPs who are or potentially will be disloyal to Boris get purged.

That will be everyone then except cock sucker Dorries and Rees-Smug.
Leave a comment:
AtW replied

9 June 2022, 16:48
Originally posted by SueEllen View Post

Without the 148 back benchers the Tory party won't be in government.

It will be if all MPs who are or potentially will be disloyal to Boris get purged.
Leave a comment:
Guy At Charnock Richard replied

9 June 2022, 16:48
He's got nutters eyes.

Worse than that, he is on record as stating his wish for us to have implemented a Chinese style zero covid lockdown.

That's all I need to know.
Leave a comment:
SueEllen replied

9 June 2022, 16:43
So Gove wants Hunt to lose his seat?

Without the 148 back benchers the Tory party won't be in government.
Leave a comment:
AtW started a topic Tory Rebel Scum: The Hunt

9 June 2022, 14:39
Tory Rebel Scum: The Hunt

"Jeremy Hunt hits out at Gove over Surrey gas drilling

Jeremy Hunt has lashed out at Michael Gove over the decision to approve a gas drilling project in scenic Surrey countryside in his constituency.

The former leadership contender, who is MP for South West Surrey, said allowing drilling in Dunsfold was "bitterly disappointing and wrong both economically and environmentally"."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...rices-economy/

Should have voted the right way, as previously advised...
Tags: None