Calling a man ‘bald’ is sex-related harassment, employment tribunal rules

[d000hg]

Given what we end up marrying, it's a blessed release.

Strange how they only become awful after marrying you, eh?

[Zigenare]

Only because men drop dead earlier.

Given what we end up marrying, it's a blessed release.

[vetran]

I think we did that already. I can call you senile because dementia is more common in ladies than men.

well I suppose at last Alexei has come second!

[SueEllen]

I think we did that already. I can call you senile because dementia is more common in ladies than men.

Only because men drop dead earlier.

[d000hg]

I think we did that already. I can call you senile because dementia is more common in ladies than men.

[WTFH]

KUATB!

[AtW]

"Calling a man “bald” is sex-related harassment, an employment tribunal has ruled.

Hair loss is much more prevalent among men than women so using it to describe someone is a form of sex-related harassment, a judgment has concluded. Commenting on a man’s baldness in the workplace is equivalent to remarking on the size of a woman’s breasts, the finding suggests.

The ruling – made by a panel of three men who in making their judgment bemoaned their own lack of hair – comes in a case between a veteran electrician and the manufacturing firm where he was employed.

Tony Finn – who is in line for compensation – had worked for the West Yorkshire-based British Bung Company for almost 24 years when he was fired in May last year. He took the company to the tribunal claiming, among other things, he had been the victim of sex-related harassment after an incident with the factory supervisor, Jamie King.

Finn alleged that during a shopfloor row in July 2019, King had referred to him as a “bald cunt”. The tribunal heard Finn was less upset by the “Anglo-Saxon” language than the comment on his appearance."

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...tribunal-rules

"made by a panel of three men who in making their judgment bemoaned their own lack of hair"

Grounds for appeal, Shirley?