• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Oh goody nutters with nukes."

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post

    I can't think of anything more likely to get him 'removed' than proven long-distance nuke capability!
    Why? the American people being nuked as the US military unleash shock & awe isn't good VT.

    The minute he had Nukes the US started to calm down.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    No he is obsessed with keeping the USofA from pursuing "regime change" seems to have worked. Combine that with a wish to upset the south it makes sense.
    I can't think of anything more likely to get him 'removed' than proven long-distance nuke capability!

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    That's why he's obsessed with building ICBMs?
    But yes I would agree the Tallyban are much more worrisome. Even N. Korea would fear to fire a nuke for fear of reprisals, I'm not sure our Afghan friends wouldn't view it as acceptable sacrifice.
    No he is obsessed with keeping the USofA from pursuing "regime change" seems to have worked. Combine that with a wish to upset the south it makes sense.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    Kim Jong sicko is only into terrorising his own people.
    That's why he's obsessed with building ICBMs?
    But yes I would agree the Tallyban are much more worrisome. Even N. Korea would fear to fire a nuke for fear of reprisals, I'm not sure our Afghan friends wouldn't view it as acceptable sacrifice.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Perhaps Pakistan will nuke Afghanistan if the Taliban get uppity. "We made you - we can break you".

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    It's ok, our mate in N.Korea will sort them out
    Kim Jong sicko is only into terrorising his own people. The Taliban like attacking the west.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    It's ok, our mate in N.Korea will sort them out

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    started a topic Oh goody nutters with nukes.

    Oh goody nutters with nukes.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...hn-Bolton.html

    The Taliban could get their hands on up to 150 nuclear weapons after America's catastrophic withdrawal from Afghanistan, says Trump's former security adviser John Bolton
    • Former security advisor John Bolton warned Taliban could get nuclear weapons
    • He said the militants could get 150 nuclear weapons if they take over Pakistan
    • The US completed a catastrophic withdrawal from Afghanistan on August 30
    • Taliban have seized equipment abandoned by US troops in final days in Kabul
    OK its just a possibility but Pakistan has supported their aims.
Working...
X