Oh goody nutters with nukes.

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

vetran replied

27 September 2021, 21:21
Originally posted by d000hg View Post

I can't think of anything more likely to get him 'removed' than proven long-distance nuke capability!

Why? the American people being nuked as the US military unleash shock & awe isn't good VT.

The minute he had Nukes the US started to calm down.
Leave a comment:
d000hg replied

27 September 2021, 21:09
Originally posted by vetran View Post

No he is obsessed with keeping the USofA from pursuing "regime change" seems to have worked. Combine that with a wish to upset the south it makes sense.

I can't think of anything more likely to get him 'removed' than proven long-distance nuke capability!
Leave a comment:
vetran replied

27 September 2021, 21:08
Originally posted by d000hg View Post

That's why he's obsessed with building ICBMs?
But yes I would agree the Tallyban are much more worrisome. Even N. Korea would fear to fire a nuke for fear of reprisals, I'm not sure our Afghan friends wouldn't view it as acceptable sacrifice.

No he is obsessed with keeping the USofA from pursuing "regime change" seems to have worked. Combine that with a wish to upset the south it makes sense.
Leave a comment:
d000hg replied

27 September 2021, 20:01
Originally posted by vetran View Post

Kim Jong sicko is only into terrorising his own people.

That's why he's obsessed with building ICBMs?
But yes I would agree the Tallyban are much more worrisome. Even N. Korea would fear to fire a nuke for fear of reprisals, I'm not sure our Afghan friends wouldn't view it as acceptable sacrifice.
Leave a comment:
NotAllThere replied

27 September 2021, 17:06
Perhaps Pakistan will nuke Afghanistan if the Taliban get uppity. "We made you - we can break you".
Leave a comment:
vetran replied

27 September 2021, 15:08
Originally posted by ladymuck View Post

It's ok, our mate in N.Korea will sort them out

Kim Jong sicko is only into terrorising his own people. The Taliban like attacking the west.
Leave a comment:
ladymuck replied

27 September 2021, 13:39
It's ok, our mate in N.Korea will sort them out
Leave a comment:
vetran started a topic Oh goody nutters with nukes.

27 September 2021, 13:25
Oh goody nutters with nukes.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...hn-Bolton.html

The Taliban could get their hands on up to 150 nuclear weapons after America's catastrophic withdrawal from Afghanistan, says Trump's former security adviser John Bolton
Former security advisor John Bolton warned Taliban could get nuclear weapons

He said the militants could get 150 nuclear weapons if they take over Pakistan

The US completed a catastrophic withdrawal from Afghanistan on August 30

Taliban have seized equipment abandoned by US troops in final days in Kabul

OK its just a possibility but Pakistan has supported their aims.
Tags: None