Reply to: Catholics question why Boris Johnson was able to marry in church

[AtW]

Apparently Carrie's dad does know how many children he has unlike her husband...

Carrie’s dad can count?

[SueEllen]

Neither is he.

Apparently Carrie's dad does know how many children he has unlike her husband...

[NotAllThere]

Not sure how many children he has

Neither is he.

[SueEllen]

Who paid for the wedding anyway, Lord of Siberia this time?

The father of the bride is suppose to pay.

Not sure how many children he has but I've not bothered to try to find out.

[AtW]

Who paid for the wedding anyway, Lord of Siberia this time?

[AtW]

He does, give all your money to your ex wives so you can't even afford to redecorate your flat then push out another sprog.

So, in other words he is unfit to run a tiny brewery, nevermind being a PM?

[vetran]

Oh and you can't have secret marriages in England you need to give 28 days notice unless you are terminally ill and apply for an exemption, so the wedding wasn't secret.

It appears the press weren't doing their job and didn't notice in the last 12 months that the PM was giving notice that he was getting married.

I think he is pretty sick!

[vetran]

“According to the papal biographer Austen Ivereigh, the prime minister’s two previous marriages were unlikely to have been recognised in Catholic law, as his former spouses were not Catholic, nor were the weddings Catholic ceremonies. Therefore, a “simple administrative process” was likely to have been used to declare the previous marriages invalid.”

If only Brillo knew of this loophole

He does, give all your money to your ex wives so you can't even afford to redecorate your flat then push out another sprog.

[DoctorStrangelove]

Well that explains the number of children: Vatican Roulette.

Bozo can't even get that right.

[AtW]

Seems so. According to a commenter in The Times:

Boris was baptised a Catholic, which means he is subject to Church laws, one of which is that Catholics can only be legitimately married in a Catholic church by a priest. His previous marriages were not conducted in a Catholic church, so they don't count as marriages.

Wow, he could honestly tell everybody that it will be his first and last marriage, in Catholic Church

[NotAllThere]

“According to the papal biographer Austen Ivereigh, the prime minister’s two previous marriages were unlikely to have been recognised in Catholic law, as his former spouses were not Catholic, nor were the weddings Catholic ceremonies. Therefore, a “simple administrative process” was likely to have been used to declare the previous marriages invalid.”

Seems so. According to a commenter in The Times:

Boris was baptised a Catholic, which means he is subject to Church laws, one of which is that Catholics can only be legitimately married in a Catholic church by a priest. His previous marriages were not conducted in a Catholic church, so they don't count as marriages.

[AtW]

He did give notice, the date announced was July 2022

(yes I know it's outside the 12 months time limit)

So he lied, again.

[ladymuck]

Oh and you can't have secret marriages in England you need to give 28 days notice unless you are terminally ill and apply for an exemption, so the wedding wasn't secret.

It appears the press weren't doing their job and didn't notice in the last 12 months that the PM was giving notice that he was getting married.

He did give notice, the date announced was July 2022

(yes I know it's outside the 12 months time limit)

[minestrone]

I think Catholics are more interested when Biden is going to get refused communion.

Permanently this time.

[SueEllen]

Oh and you can't have secret marriages in England you need to give 28 days notice unless you are terminally ill and apply for an exemption, so the wedding wasn't secret.

It appears the press weren't doing their job and didn't notice in the last 12 months that the PM was giving notice that he was getting married.