• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Reporting accountants for IR35 breaches"

Collapse

  • pr1
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    IR35 doesn't apply because:

    1. There's no intermediary

    Er... that'll do. There's lots of other reasons, but if an accountant were to work as a contractor for a large company, then they would indeed be affected by IR35.
    OP said "an accountant or lawyer who sets up as a small business or firm" - let's assume a limited company, i.e. an intermediary

    Leave a comment:


  • IR35equalshateoflittleguy
    replied
    Originally posted by pr1 View Post

    Is that true? what about 999 companies? or 100? or 1? where is the line where IR35 would apply?

    OP doesn't seem very good at making their point but I appreciate the point they are trying to make
    In all seriousness, as far as i am aware, the amount of companies the PSC has doesn't make them a MSP. The requirements to become a MSP is that they have a minimum of 80 consultants working for the company and they are FCSA registered. I don't see why it is so unreasonable to ask accountants themselves to be held to account for the same accountancy rules their industry helped created, some might say it is only fair. If they want to create their own accountancy firm, then they should have to deal with the same barriers to entry that IT consultants now have to deal with.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by pr1 View Post
    Is that true? what about 999 companies? or 100? or 1? where is the line where IR35 would apply?
    IR35 doesn't apply to the vast majority of accountants because:

    1. There's no intermediary

    Er... that'll do. There's lots of other reasons, but if an accountant were to work as a contractor for a large company, then they would indeed be affected by IR35. That's obvious. In the same way as luvvies contracting to the BBC, or lawyers contracting to an NHS trust. Then they would have to apply the tests same as anyone else.

    The problem with the OP's posts are that he's being utterly unclear as to exactly who he is targetting, and why they're affected by IR35.

    The other problem is that he is suspiciously like other another troll who loves to come to the professional forums and try to stir things up.

    Leave a comment:


  • IR35equalshateoflittleguy
    replied
    Originally posted by pr1 View Post

    Is that true? what about 999 companies? or 100? or 1? where is the line where IR35 would apply?

    OP doesn't seem very good at making their point but I appreciate the point they are trying to make
    IR35 only applies to the IT industry it seems...

    Leave a comment:


  • pr1
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post

    Well, you just have to be patient, especially as you're posting such unintelligible nonsense. If your accountant is providing services to 1000 individuals/small companies, IR35 doesn't apply. What point exactly are you
    Is that true? what about 999 companies? or 100? or 1? where is the line where IR35 would apply?

    OP doesn't seem very good at making their point but I appreciate the point they are trying to make

    Leave a comment:


  • IR35equalshateoflittleguy
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post

    Well, you just have to be patient, especially as you're posting such unintelligible nonsense. If your accountant is providing services to 1000 individuals/small companies, IR35 doesn't apply. What point exactly are you
    My point is that there are small accountancies and law firms that fit the criteria of IR35 and we should report them. Accountants and Lawyers think they are exempt from IR35 and they are not.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Shame we can't move this to general

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by IR35equalshateoflittleguy View Post
    Would be great if you approve my comment
    Well, you just have to be patient, especially as you're posting such unintelligible nonsense. If your accountant is providing services to 1000 individuals/small companies, IR35 doesn't apply. What point exactly are you

    Leave a comment:


  • IR35equalshateoflittleguy
    replied
    Would be great if you approve my comment

    Leave a comment:


  • IR35equalshateoflittleguy
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    Good grief, what makes you think that’s illegal?

    It’s not sensible, and agents won’t select you if you try it but it’s not illegal.
    If the accountant's limited company is not FCSA registered with 80 accountants hired, then they are a PSC and not a MSP and should be paid through an umbrella company. Does IR35 not apply to accountants and lawyers?

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by IR35equalshateoflittleguy View Post

    If an accountant or lawyer sets up a small businesses or small legal firm and works as a consultant to clients that would be a breach of ir35. They should be instead employed through an umbrella company and pay PAYE tax or the client should hire them as an employee.
    Good grief, what makes you think that’s illegal?

    It’s not sensible, and agents won’t select you if you try it, but provided you pay the right tax it’s not illegal.

    Leave a comment:


  • IR35equalshateoflittleguy
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    This post makes no sense. Why should accountants be responsible for IR35 breaches?

    This is stupid, unless you mean agents.
    If an accountant or lawyer sets up a small businesses or small legal firm and works as a consultant to clients that would be a breach of ir35. They should be instead employed through an umbrella company and pay PAYE tax or the client should hire them as an employee.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    When we have people like this and those pillocks starting the petitions we know we are screwed. Why is it the clueless lot seem to want to make the most noise?

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    This post makes no sense. Why should accountants be responsible for IR35 breaches?

    This is stupid, unless you mean agents.

    Leave a comment:


  • Reporting accountants for IR35 breaches

    One of my hobbies is reporting accountants for IR35 breaches. Anyone have any good stories on how they reported a small business accountant for IR35 breaches?

Working...
X