Originally posted by vetran
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: How not to treat...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "How not to treat..."
Collapse
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
On this issue the Met Police needed to be embarrassed as they have clear issues in who they recruit....
Maybe we should cancel the Rotary club as I am sure one of their members committed murder.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View Post
No as suggested lets bombard our MPs with letters, sign petitions so they cant ignore them and have a doorstep vigil that all the TV stations broadcast. Project statements on the side of buildings, paint it on the side of a bus etc.
If you want change you need to embarrass the rulers not argue with coppers for breaking the law.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
Yeah let's all put ribbons, banners and coloured squares on our twitter and instagram as athat will get loads of older people's attention particularly politicians.....
If you want change you need to embarrass the rulers not argue with coppers for breaking the law.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
If it breaches pandemic protocols YES. If it doesn't NO.
Even YOU ought to be able to grasp that, blessed as you are with a head that is emptier than a Hermit's address book.
HTH BIDI
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
So you are against a group, mainly consisting of women, holding a vigil of the death of a woman caused by a man who was in a public position of trust?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
So you are against a group, mainly consisting of women, holding a vigil of the death of a woman caused by a man who was in a public position of trust?
Even YOU ought to be able to grasp that, blessed as you are with a head that is emptier than a Hermit's address book.
HTH BIDI
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
Another of your "guesses" sailing way out of bounds then. I am opposed to ALL breaches of the pandemic rules.
Perhaps you can justify why you seem to find this vigil acceptable based solely on the premise that other groups have done similar.
Try that defence in a court and see how much water it holds.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post
It might if the only mass gatherings that trigger you are the women, the blacks and the environmentalists.
Perhaps you can justify why you seem to find this vigil acceptable based solely on the premise that other groups have done similar.
Try that defence in a court and see how much water it holds.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
You are right of course. Defacing statues and abusing the Police when they try and get you to adhere to pandemic rules has really captured the heart of the nation.
The fact they left protests that had predominately male participants alone says something about the Met Police.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
Does that really matter?
Arguably, one of the worst involved predominantly white men. And this was very recent.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: