Taxpayers pick the bill because the Minister was bullying on their behalf, it’s not pretty but it’s Priti...
...
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Priti good
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Priti good"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by vetran View Post
The employer is on the hook regardless. Now if they had followed through and sacked Priti that would be acceptable unfortunately so few employers do. I suspect she will be reshuffled to the back benches.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View Post
The employer is on the hook regardless. Now if they had followed through and sacked Priti that would be acceptable unfortunately so few employers do. I suspect she will be reshuffled to the back benches.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
The government must have decided that they are liable to pay for her actions instead of hanging her out to dry.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Scoobos View PostShouldn't Priti have to foot the bill though, why is it the taxpayer when its a case against her? She wouldnt settle for 350k or whatever it is , but it's easy when its "someone else's money" . She should have to pay a personal penalty, not the public purse on her behalf.
My 2 cents obvs.
Leave a comment:
-
Shouldn't Priti have to foot the bill though, why is it the taxpayer when its a case against her? She wouldnt settle for 350k or whatever it is , but it's easy when its "someone else's money" . She should have to pay a personal penalty, not the public purse on her behalf.
My 2 cents obvs.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Scoobos View PostHow is this not corruption?
I'm not trying to be controversial or take the micky - but haven't a political party in power, just bought off a scandal with public funds, the day after a budget that says we have a deficit of historic levels?
Is there another angle to be looking at this from?
Leave a comment:
-
How is this not corruption?
I'm not trying to be controversial or take the micky - but haven't a political party in power, just bought off a scandal with public funds, the day after a budget that says we have a deficit of historic levels?
Is there another angle to be looking at this from?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View Post"Priti Patel reaches six-figure settlement with ex-Home Office chief Philip Rutnam
Former permanent secretary sued government over alleged bullying by home secretary
Priti Patel has reached a six-figure settlement with a senior civil servant following claims that he was forced out of his job for intervening in her alleged bullying of fellow staff, it has emerged.
Sir Philip Rutnam, the former permanent secretary in the Home Office, had threatened to take the home secretary to an employment tribunal hearing in September.
He also claimed he had been hounded out of his job for defending his staff, and was suing the government under whistleblowing laws."
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-philip-rutnam
999999 is a 6-figure sum...
Leave a comment:
-
Priti good
"Priti Patel reaches six-figure settlement with ex-Home Office chief Philip Rutnam
Former permanent secretary sued government over alleged bullying by home secretary
Priti Patel has reached a six-figure settlement with a senior civil servant following claims that he was forced out of his job for intervening in her alleged bullying of fellow staff, it has emerged.
Sir Philip Rutnam, the former permanent secretary in the Home Office, had threatened to take the home secretary to an employment tribunal hearing in September.
He also claimed he had been hounded out of his job for defending his staff, and was suing the government under whistleblowing laws."
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-philip-rutnam
999999 is a 6-figure sum...Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: