• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Just had a thought

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Just had a thought"

Collapse

  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post

    According to the Readers' Digest, a bearded dragon can live for 15 years in captivity so I'd hazard that makes our Duke over 1,400 years old?
    This

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post

    What's 99 in lizard years?
    Very, very old. i'm surprised he can digest the grasshoppers anymore

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post

    What's 99 in lizard years?
    According to the Readers' Digest, a bearded dragon can live for 15 years in captivity so I'd hazard that makes our Duke over 1,400 years old?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by Whorty View Post

    Yeah, that's it 100%. Nothing to do with the fact he's 99 years old and susceptible to all manner of infections. Yeah, definitely must be the covid jab
    What's 99 in lizard years?

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Could Prince Philip's current ailment be an adverse reaction to the Covid jab, and officials are reluctant to publicise that for fear of encouraging anti-vax sentiment?

    (Not hinting that any anti-vax notion is sensible, because I think anti-vaxers are barking mad and on the balance of risks it's far better for anyone, especially old timers, to have the jab vs not. But even though the old boy is 99 and could therefore conk out at any moment, the timing of his present indisposition does seem more than a coincidence)
    Yeah, that's it 100%. Nothing to do with the fact he's 99 years old and susceptible to all manner of infections. Yeah, definitely must be the covid jab

    Leave a comment:


  • courtg9000
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    He has form for being taken in as a precautionary measure. He may have ailments that have never been made public and that's what's affecting him now.

    It is also possible that he had an adverse reaction to the vaccine.

    There is no way to know unless you can trick the hospital into giving out information...
    Wheres an Australian prankster when you need one?

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post

    Because he'd have some serious explaining to do... (Urinary tract infection, indeed ​​​​​​​)
    At least it's not syphilis

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    He has form for being taken in as a precautionary measure. He may have ailments that have never been made public and that's what's affecting him now.
    Because he'd have some serious explaining to do... (Urinary tract infection, indeed ​​​​​​​)

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    There is no way to know unless you can trick the hospital into giving out information...
    We can always ask NLUK's accountant...

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    He has form for being taken in as a precautionary measure. He may have ailments that have never been made public and that's what's affecting him now.

    It is also possible that he had an adverse reaction to the vaccine.

    There is no way to know unless you can trick the hospital into giving out information...

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Could Prince Philip's current ailment be an adverse reaction to the Covid jab, and officials are reluctant to publicise that for fear of encouraging anti-vax sentiment?

    (Not hinting that any anti-vax notion is sensible, because I think anti-vaxers are barking mad and on the balance of risks it's far better for anyone, especially old timers, to have the jab vs not. But even though the old boy is 99 and could therefore conk out at any moment, the timing of his present indisposition does seem more than a coincidence)
    I'm not sure how you work that out.
    At age 99 he has a 1/3 chance of dying. So to become hospitalised is more likely than not.

    Source: Actuarial Life Table (ssa.gov)

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Could Prince Philip's current ailment be an adverse reaction to the Covid jab, and officials are reluctant to publicise that for fear of encouraging anti-vax sentiment?

    (Not hinting that any anti-vax notion is sensible, because I think anti-vaxers are barking mad and on the balance of risks it's far better for anyone, especially old timers, to have the jab vs not. But even though the old boy is 99 and could therefore conk out at any moment, the timing of his present indisposition does seem more than a coincidence)
    Yes, you can also track Prince Philip if you have a 5G phone.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    and I'm equally certain they didn't, not least because it had hardly been tested back then.



    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post

    No, because they certainly had it 6+ months ago ..
    and I'm equally certain they didn't, not least because it had hardly been tested back then.

    I'm certain they (HMQ & hubby, and others in the royal household) had it only a couple of weeks ago when this was publicised.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Could Prince Philip's current ailment be an adverse reaction to the Covid jab
    No, because they certainly had it 6+ months ago

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X