• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Scottish secession: the battle for indyref2 reaches court"

Collapse

  • ladymuck
    replied
    Which court? The tennis court?

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Salmond was a master of economic persuasion, a true master...

    "we put in more than we take out"

    ...was justified because we were not borrowing as much.

    He should be selling home reversion plans to 80 year olds.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    "The fact that the Scottish government has not updated or revised these figures since 2013 makes it impossible for us to stand up Mr Blackford’s claim at the moment."

    This is just gibberish.

    The assertions made in the white paper in 2013 come from the Scottish Government stats. These are published yearly and I believe go back 40 years. The SNP claim these are the "the authoritative publication on Scotland's public finances" yet C4 then quote and claim the information is "experimental".

    Blackford is a total idiot. I mean he is beyond stupid to the extent the only reasonable assumption to make is he is there deliberately as an idiot. Probably to stop Joanna Cherry from getting a leg up and challenging Sturgeon.

    Cherry is just moderately unlikeable which makes her one of the stand out personalities of the SNP. A QC which dwarfs Sturgeon's "I've got a law degree" and has actually come out as a lesbian.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Putting a price on subsidy now?


    FTFY.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Putting a price on sovereignty now?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Maybe it’s like Brexit. Most Brexiteers seem content that there will be an economic price to pay.

    We will see. lets hope they make the best decision for everyone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Maybe it’s like Brexit. Most Brexiteers seem content that there will be an economic price to pay.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    based on our exit deal we we probably should hand back 15% of the oil revenues then have a few hundred years for our oil companies to adjust followed by something about independence for Shetland.

    FactCheck: has Scotland ‘subsidised the rest of the UK’? – Channel 4 News

    Back in 2013, it was possible to use these figures to back the idea that Scotland paid slightly more into the UK’s coffers than it took out. That’s if you add up the tax and spending in those years cumulatively, and if you make a number of assumptions about Scotland’s finances, all of which are subject to argument.But the overall balance was close, according to one detailed analysis: even making concessions to nationalist arguments about Scotland’s likely historic debt, higher UK public spending on Scotland almost completely cancelled out any surplus created by “Scottish” oil.
    The fact that the Scottish government has not updated or revised these figures since 2013 makes it impossible for us to stand up Mr Blackford’s claim at the moment.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Something about oil followed by something about independence for Shetland.
    Jew? Are you JEW.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    "Maybe the Scottish people"

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    FTFY
    Something about oil followed by something about independence for Shetland.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Maybe the Scottish people don’t want to be in a UK superstate with all those additional layers of government, bureaucracy, free cash and red tape.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Scotland can’t make its own free trade deals!
    Do they have borerline ****wit as a pass mark on the "let a ****** idiot in" test?

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Scotland got no control over borders!
    Wild if true.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Maybe the Scottish people don’t want to be in a UK superstate with all those additional layers of government, bureaucracy and red tape.
    Scotland got no control over borders!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X