Reply to: Trump urged to consider declaring martial law

[AtW]

The lady admitted that she voted in her mother’s name because it was her mother’s dying wish to vote for Trump.

And so your argument is that if it could happen with vote for Trump, then it could also happen for Biden, therefore election is fraudulent and Trump should be kept in place by his buddies in the Congress where they have less votes, but more delegations (which is what would matter here)?

[NotAllThere]

Just because you've got a huge brain...

It's almost completely smooth and white.

[Whorty]

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/ne...146938034.html

There you go. It was proven but they declined to prosecute. It took me less than a minute to find.

1 person. And it was a fraud for Trump. Not exactly the evidence you are trying to find that Biden stole the election is it mate?

Taking your previous logic I'd say that was evidence that we can use to extrapolate that all Trump's votes were fraudulent

You have no evidence of proven Biden fraud then?

[Old Greg]

The lady admitted that she voted in her mother’s name because it was her mother’s dying wish to vote for Trump.

Or are you some grammar nazi telling me it should be “proved”?

So you mean “admitted”, rather than “proven”. Thanks for taking the time to correct your poor English.

[darmstadt]

Democracy Docket | Highlighting Suppressive Voting Laws & Practices | Marc Elias

[hugebrain]

You don’t know what ‘proven’ means, do you?

The lady admitted that she voted in her mother’s name because it was her mother’s dying wish to vote for Trump.

Or are you some grammar nazi telling me it should be “proved”?

[AtW]

That's DimPrawn's sockie, based on 'proven' evidence so far

[AtW]

You don’t know what ‘proven’ means, do you?

Finally the cavalry, I've felt my IQ suffered increase of at least -50 points...

[Old Greg]

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/ne...146938034.html

There you go. It was proven but they declined to prosecute. It took me less than a minute to find.

You don’t know what ‘proven’ means, do you?

[AtW]

Just demonstrating it’s easy to find proven evidence of fraud in US elections.

It's easy to find proven evidence that you are an imbecile.

But is that enough to section you?

Sadly no, but that's how it works legally.

[hugebrain]

... and is it material enough to change the election?

Well no. Trump won by more than one vote. Just demonstrating it’s easy to find proven evidence of fraud in US elections.

[AtW]

There you go. It was proven but they declined to prosecute. It took me less than a minute to find.

... and is it material enough to change the election?

[hugebrain]

Nope, can't find anything when I search Google for proven fraud in the US Election. Lots of conspiracy theories, all debunked, but no proven cases of fraud.

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/ne...146938034.html

There you go. It was proven but they declined to prosecute. It took me less than a minute to find.

[AtW]

The only US elections fraud going is the people trying to falsely claim it happened.

[Whorty]

Not necessarily, but it does seem to be repeated (and worse) in all the machine counted votes, there are a lot of them, and in the postal votes that were illegal. A quick internet search should help, now that I’ve explained to you how the links work.

Nope, can't find anything when I search Google for proven fraud in the US Election. Lots of conspiracy theories, all debunked, but no proven cases of fraud.