Reply to: revisionism is well under way.

[Old Greg]

Hmm. If I banned people according to my standards, that'd leave no one. Including me. But what's drivel according to his usual standards - they do keep dropping, so eventually I'd be unable to ban anything.

If he is indeed suffering from degenerative cretinism, then you need to make adjustments that take the degenerative nature of the affliction into account.

[NotAllThere]

Under the Equality Act, you would need to make a reasonable adjustment for vetran. Essentially you could only ban him for what would be drivel in relation to his own usual standards.

Hmm. If I banned people according to my standards, that'd leave no one. Including me. But what's drivel according to his usual standards - they do keep dropping, so eventually I'd be unable to ban anything.

[Old Greg]

But you post so much, surely you're used to drivel? Perhaps I should ban drivel - or would that be censorship.

I just can't navigate this woke world anymore.

Under the Equality Act, you would need to make a reasonable adjustment for vetran. Essentially you could only ban him for what would be drivel in relation to his own usual standards.

[NotAllThere]

no concession I just can't be bothered to reply to your drivel any more on this thread.

But you post so much, surely you're used to drivel? Perhaps I should ban drivel - or would that be censorship.

I just can't navigate this woke world anymore.

[Old Greg]

Your obsession with my ass is noted.

As is your inability to understand metaphors.

[vetran]

That's how you're hiding your defeat.

Your obsession with my ass is noted.

[Old Greg]

no concession I just can't be bothered to reply to your drivel any more on this thread.

That's how you're hiding your defeat.

[vetran]

I accept your concession. You win the usual prize - your arse on a plate.

no concession I just can't be bothered to reply to your drivel any more on this thread.

[Old Greg]

Greg you seem to be at the bottom of the barrel careful you might bump into NAT & WTFH.

I accept your concession. You win the usual prize - your arse on a plate.

[vetran]

There are an uncountable number of facts, so it would be impossible to present all the facts. A museum has a mission statement and scope. I wouldn't expect the Shropshire County Museum to present facts about Essex or a Museum of Morris Dancing to present facts about traditional Australian Aboriginal dance. They would be "out of scope". Why wouldn't you accept a Museum of White Child Abusers that focuses on its mission statement and "scope"? They're not stopping someone else start a different museum. You either think it's fine to open this museum or you appear to be supporting what you refer to as "censorship".

Greg you seem to be at the bottom of the barrel careful you might bump into NAT & WTFH.

[Old Greg]

No I would want it to present all the facts without prejudice. Wouldn't you?

There are an uncountable number of facts, so it would be impossible to present all the facts. A museum has a mission statement and scope. I wouldn't expect the Shropshire County Museum to present facts about Essex or a Museum of Morris Dancing to present facts about traditional Australian Aboriginal dance. They would be "out of scope". Why wouldn't you accept a Museum of White Child Abusers that focuses on its mission statement and "scope"? They're not stopping someone else start a different museum. You either think it's fine to open this museum or you appear to be supporting what you refer to as "censorship".

[vetran]

So would you want the museum to censor the truth?

No I would want it to present all the facts without prejudice. Wouldn't you?

[Old Greg]

I would object on the grounds it was racist just as I would if there was a museum of BAME child abuse.

So would you want the museum to censor the truth?

[vetran]

And the Catholic church?

If you want an exhibit for them then why not, we can add witch finding, the inquisition, Aztec child sacrifice and the peri-pubescent marriages in Islam if you want.

[vetran]

That's another story, that's not within the mission statement of this fictional museum.

You wouldn't object, would you, to a Museum of White Child Abusers, as long as it was telling the truth about White Child Abusers?

I would object on the grounds it was racist just as I would if there was a museum of BAME child abuse.