• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Rise of the anti-maskers: The psychology of why face coverings are causing so much up"

Collapse

  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    “ More than a century ago, as the 1918 influenza pandemic raged in the United States, masks of gauze and cheesecloth became the facial front lines in the battle against the virus. But as they have now, the masks also stoked political division. Then, as now, medical authorities urged the wearing of masks to help slow the spread of disease. And then, as now, some people resisted.”

    The 1918 Flu, Masks and Lessons for the Coronavirus Pandemic - The New York Times

    One would have thought number of Mor Ons would be reduced
    Consider that PC has 17 kids and work it out from there.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    “ More than a century ago, as the 1918 influenza pandemic raged in the United States, masks of gauze and cheesecloth became the facial front lines in the battle against the virus. But as they have now, the masks also stoked political division. Then, as now, medical authorities urged the wearing of masks to help slow the spread of disease. And then, as now, some people resisted.”

    The 1918 Flu, Masks and Lessons for the Coronavirus Pandemic - The New York Times

    One would have thought number of Mor Ons would be reduced
    I suggest you go and watch the film "Idiocracy".

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    “ More than a century ago, as the 1918 influenza pandemic raged in the United States, masks of gauze and cheesecloth became the facial front lines in the battle against the virus. But as they have now, the masks also stoked political division. Then, as now, medical authorities urged the wearing of masks to help slow the spread of disease. And then, as now, some people resisted.”

    The 1918 Flu, Masks and Lessons for the Coronavirus Pandemic - The New York Times

    One would have thought number of Mor Ons would be reduced

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Don't be silly. It's all done by 5G.
    Just wait until 6G comes along.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Would be acceptable if they could not spread them to others - and if those on top of this ignorance movement were not making money on taking advantage of the dumb.
    And they put their kids at risk. I remember a conversation with an anti MMR parent who told me that no child ever died of measles.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On View Post
    Well if it's not targeting the gene it's got to be something to do with the RFID chip.
    Don't be silly. It's all done by 5G.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Not always. Sometimes they get to die of diseases which they refused vaccination for, or which they denied existed.
    Would be acceptable if they could not spread them to others - and if those on top of this ignorance movement were not making money on taking advantage of the dumb.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Not always. Sometimes they get to die of diseases which they refused vaccination for, or which they denied existed.
    Suffering from being a cretin followed by death sounds about right.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    Cretins have to live with being cretins, which is its own form of punishment. You can also avoid enriching them. For example, don't use their accountancy practices.
    Not always. Sometimes they get to die of diseases which they refused vaccination for, or which they denied existed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post
    They keep it a secret otherwise the morons would have evidence to use......
    Well if it's not targeting the gene it's got to be something to do with the RFID chip.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On View Post
    How would Big Pharma make MOr Ons dumb with a vaccine? Would they target the MOr On gene somehow?
    They keep it a secret otherwise the morons would have evidence to use......

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On View Post
    How would Big Pharma make MOr Ons dumb with a vaccine? Would they target the MOr On gene somehow?
    Can somebody explain our Dear Mor On Leader what I meant

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    It's a bit like when an astrologer tries to debate with an astronomer. The gap is so huge, that the latter naming the former a moron really is appropriate.
    Astrologer would not be surprised because being called a Mor On would be in his/her horoscope

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Vaccines work best if enough people get them - so you can’t make much money on those anyway: cost estimated to be 10-20 bucks per shot, hardly enough margin to pay off Mor Ons suing Big Pharma for making Mor Ons dumb.

    Big Pharma got vested interest to make it work actually because with Covid unchecked they won’t sell higher margin products.

    If I was offered Phase 3 trial of Oxford vaccine then I’d probably go for it. More traditional will arrive in a year - defiantly will get one of those.
    How would Big Pharma make MOr Ons dumb with a vaccine? Would they target the MOr On gene somehow?

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    It’s not a criminal or civil offence to be a Mor On, but it’s ought to be during emergencies like now.
    Cretins have to live with being cretins, which is its own form of punishment. You can also avoid enriching them. For example, don't use their accountancy practices.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X