• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Sorry about all that alarmist climate change stuff"

Collapse

  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by DoctorStrangelove View Post
    Those nutjobs all think that it's The End Times with an imminent Rapture and they're about to be taken up into Heaven/A spaceship/an alternate dimension/a different computer simulation*.


    *Delete where not applicable.
    They're a funny bunch. I got permabanned from Rapture Ready years ago. There were a number of people who claimed to have spent their kids' college funds on survival packs for the Left Behind. It was real Pooper-gone-religious territory,

    Leave a comment:


  • Andy2
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    'God intended it as a disposable planet': meet the US pastor preaching climate change denial

    Turns out the earth was never intended to be permanent, it's a disposal object put here for us to use and dispose of as we see fit.
    we will need a bigger rubbish bin

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Those nutjobs all think that it's The End Times with an imminent Rapture and they're about to be taken up into Heaven/A spaceship/an alternate dimension/a different computer simulation*.


    *Delete where not applicable.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    'God intended it as a disposable planet': meet the US pastor preaching climate change denial

    Turns out the earth was never intended to be permanent, it's a disposal object put here for us to use and dispose of as we see fit.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Ploptimus View Post

    Disappointed you aren't 'Shawshank Redemptioning' it out in the yard.
    Hehe! well I did contemplate "The Great Escaping" it, by packing small bags tied to my legs and pulling a string to release it in some public space and shuffling it into the ground while casually whistling.

    But unfortunatey it isn't just dirt, and that technique doesn't work so well with broken tiles and bits of rusty metal etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ploptimus
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    My local tip (run by a company called Viridor) charges by weight for hardcore, and it soon mounts up, e.g. somewhere around £100 for one builder's bag.

    So I have split my 12 bags of harcore into well over a hundred supermarket carrier bags, each fairly light, and I smuggle three bags out per bin each fortnight with the domestic rubbish.
    Disappointed you aren't 'Shawshank Redemptioning' it out in the yard.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    The last figures I saw showed the wealthy as a group consumed far more than 'hordes of the world's poor".
    Isn't that just MF?

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    The last figures I saw showed the wealthy as a group consumed far more than 'hordes of the world's poor".

    That doesn't fit his narrative.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    The worst offenders, per head, yes of course, I do accept that.

    But I imagine their consumption is dwarfed by the collective consumption of the hordes of poor people in places such as India and Nigeria (among others).
    The last figures I saw showed the wealthy as a group consumed far more than 'hordes of the world's poor".

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post

    The worst offenders of overconsumption are the wealthy. You refuse to accept that ...
    The worst offenders, per head, yes of course, I do accept that.

    But I imagine their consumption is dwarfed by the collective consumption of the hordes of poor people in places such as India and Nigeria (among others).

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Ah yes, the "keep the wealthy producing more inbreds"

    The worst offenders of overconsumption are the wealthy. You refuse to accept that, because it would be something you can't pass the blame on to others - it would require you to take action that would impact you.
    Now he's taken a contract @ 320 pd, he may change his viewpoint.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    No no no. Only the rich may reproduce freely. It's survival of the fittest, and clearly, the rich are the fittest or they wouldn't have survived. I'm sure if you were rich you'd see my point of view.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    If you stopped the relatively small proportion of rich people procreating, a new lot of relatively small proportion of rich people would pop up in their place, and the poor would carry on breeding like rabbits. So I'm afraid your idealistic solution would fail miserably.

    The best way to encourage population curbs on the worst offenders such as India and China, is to impose santions if they don't introduce policies such as 2 child max families and severe penalties on anyone exceeding those quotas.

    Ah yes, the "keep the wealthy producing more inbreds"

    The worst offenders of overconsumption are the wealthy. You refuse to accept that, because it would be something you can't pass the blame on to others - it would require you to take action that would impact you.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by rogerfederer View Post
    Fossil fuel companies have monetised anti-climate change production to make profit, by efinition of their respective businesses.
    This turns out to not be the case, according to the author. Nobody takes anti-climate change groups serious, and climate activists have far higher spending than any combination of anti-climate change groups. The evidence is that fossil fuel companies have supported certain groups of climate change activists and environmentalists in their quest to shut down nuclear power. (I wonder why they'd do that? )

    Another interesting point he makes is that the climate change lobby is far more highly funded than the climate deniers (to the tune of $100Ms as opposed to $10Ms). As can be easily verified by checking out the annual reports of climate activists groups and climate denial groups.

    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    The main legacy of environmentalism will be the disappearance of the world's forests.
    He claims that re-forestation of first world countries continues apace. "Globally, the rate of reforestation is catching up to the slowing rate of deforestation". The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations have stated that the global rate of deforestation has reduce by 50% (from 7.3 million to 3.3 million) as reforestation has accelerated.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    If you stopped the relatively small proportion of rich people procreating, a new lot of relatively small proportion of rich people would pop up in their place, and the poor would carry on breeding like rabbits. So I'm afraid your idealistic solution would fail miserably.

    The best way to encourage population curbs on the worst offenders such as India and China, is to impose santions if they don't introduce policies such as 2 child max families and severe penalties on anyone exceeding those quotas.
    Chinese population growth is largely driven by increased longevity (I would guess).

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X