• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on ""Ahmaud Arbery mum 'believes there will be justice'""

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Opinion and personal attacks WTFH improbably presented as facts with a straight face

    FTFY.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    I can see where Minestrone is coming from, the BBC have form for painting all deaths as being race related if a policeman is holding the weapon and the suspect is white. A bit of impartiality would be nice. Maybe we could deal with the majority of knife crimes or rape gangs in the UK honestly by not trying to ignore the real causes.
    Nope, he chose to only consider one of the multiple articles on the BBC website, to reinforce his (and your) bias against it.
    Both you (and he) have form in finding articles to reinforce your prejudices, like you have some sort of trigger that searches for you and tells you when you need to be offended by something you didn't even know about.
    Is it zerohedge or guidofawkes or just fox news that you use for your triggering?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Is the real cause male violent tendencies?

    possibly who knows? maybe we should investigate rather than jump to conclusions?

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    A white (ex) cop shoots a black man then its bound to provoke outrage, it is far too common in the USA as posted before I wouldn't want to be black and stopped by the US police my risks of death are much higher.

    We do know a man with a history of firearm offences entered a house where a more law abiding citizen probably wouldn't (it was filmed and not disputed) . We do know two apparent red necks drove after him in a truck and they were armed. We do know this chap apparently unarmed ran towards an armed man and was shot by one of these weapons.

    Barmy, Nat & Co are happy to assure everyone its murder and Minestrone is obviously an out & out racist. I will wait for the court as it seems to be investigation & trial by media not facts.

    I can see where Minestrone is coming from, the BBC have form for painting all deaths as being race related if a policeman is holding the weapon and the suspect is white. A bit of impartiality would be nice. Maybe we could deal with the majority of knife crimes or rape gangs in the UK honestly by not trying to ignore the real causes.
    Is the real cause male violent tendencies?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Of what interest or how does this story affect you? It's of a murder of a black man in another country where there seems to be a lot of murders of black men. There must be a reason for you to pick this particular story from many others. Would you have picked it if the story was exactly the same but the man in question was white and called Sam Smith?
    A white (ex) cop shoots a black man then its bound to provoke outrage, it is far too common in the USA as posted before I wouldn't want to be black and stopped by the US police my risks of death are much higher.

    We do know a man with a history of firearm offences entered a house where a more law abiding citizen probably wouldn't (it was filmed and not disputed) . We do know two apparent red necks drove after him in a truck and they were armed. We do know this chap apparently unarmed ran towards an armed man and was shot by one of these weapons.

    Barmy, Nat & Co are happy to assure everyone its murder and Minestrone is obviously an out & out racist. I will wait for the court as it seems to be investigation & trial by media not facts.

    I can see where Minestrone is coming from, the BBC have form for painting all deaths as being race related if a policeman is holding the weapon and the suspect is white. A bit of impartiality would be nice. Maybe we could deal with the majority of knife crimes or rape gangs in the UK honestly by not trying to ignore the real causes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    The video only ever shows a stationary truck with the guy already outside, Arbery is seen running towards it for 17 seconds before attacking the guy holding the gun.

    It's your crippled mental faculties that have conjured seeing a truck chasing him.

    The only reasoned explanation is that he got himself killed by running 100 yards to attack a guy with a gun and then trying to grab it off him.
    Give it a rest, you dull twunt.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Have I mentioned colour or race at any point?

    I've stuck to the facts. He was in a house that he should not have been, there were folk who wanted to stop him until the police arrived. He chased down the guy and attacked him trying to grab his gun before he was shot.

    I dont know why this gets some big story on the front of the BBC page.
    Of what interest or how does this story affect you? It's of a murder of a black man in another country where there seems to be a lot of murders of black men. There must be a reason for you to pick this particular story from many others. Would you have picked it if the story was exactly the same but the man in question was white and called Sam Smith?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    I think I put that in the first post. The article missed out a number of key points on the story.
    So do you regularly post threads when BBC articles miss a number of key points or just when they concern racist murders of minorities?

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    You may bot know why BBC put it up, but you sure know why you started this thread...
    I think I put that in the first post. The article missed out a number of key points on the story.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    You may bot know why BBC put it up, but you sure know why you started this thread...

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Have I mentioned colour or race at any point?

    I've stuck to the facts. He was in a house that he should not have been, there were folk who wanted to stop him until the police arrived. He chased down the guy and attacked him trying to grab his gun before he was shot.

    I dont know why this gets some big story on the front of the BBC page.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Inneresting how some people start threads or post about minorities of an ethnic persuasion even when it has nothing to do with them, makes you think...

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    First things first. Are you still saying this is true?



    If you are, how do you know that it is true?
    The guy was black. Of course it's true. Apropos nothing, I think I banned mini once, and he was only allowed back if he reigned in his racist tendencies...

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    The article was what his mum was saying. It was not a comprehensive study of the details of the case. Instead, about half way down they liked to other details.

    And even the video showing him "assaulting the guy with the gun", the "guy with the gun" was in a truck, chasing him down the road, then got out to attack him. Not sure how even a Trumper could twist that to being "oh but the guy running is the one who assaulted the two people int he truck who were chasing him"
    The video only ever shows a stationary truck with the guy already outside, Arbery is seen running towards it for 17 seconds before attacking the guy holding the gun.

    It's your crippled mental faculties that have conjured seeing a truck chasing him.

    The only reasoned explanation is that he got himself killed by running 100 yards to attack a guy with a gun and then trying to grab it off him.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Ehh, he assaulted the guy with the gun, punched him and tried to grab his gun. I think that is why he got shot.
    If you think that then you an idiot, which is kind of a pattern with you - pretty safe to hear your view of a case and know it’s the opposite

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X