• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Government to front 80% of wages up to £2500/month"

Collapse

  • vwdan
    replied
    Originally posted by Jemetpl View Post
    Please refer me to the specific legislation that sets out this status.
    That's now how the law works. You need to find the law which makes you an employee and gives you rights.

    Leave a comment:


  • KinooOrKinog
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    There are bits of legislation and when you out them together you fall through the gaps.
    Yes this. It's part of what all the fuss over IR35 changes has been about.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Jemetpl View Post
    Please refer me to the specific legislation that sets out this status.
    There are bits of legislation and when you out them together you fall through the gaps.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jemetpl
    replied
    Originally posted by KinooOrKinog View Post
    You're a no rights employee. An employee only for tax purposes. Same as those on zero hours contracts.
    Please refer me to the specific legislation that sets out this status.

    Leave a comment:


  • KinooOrKinog
    replied
    Originally posted by Jemetpl View Post
    I think Sunak said this during his speech on Friday but I could be wrong.

    If umbrella contractors aren’t covered, I’m puzzled to what our status actually is. Are we employees or self employed?
    You're a no rights employee. An employee only for tax purposes. Same as those on zero hours contracts.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrdonuts
    replied
    Trade bodies plea for help for contractors and freelancers | Recruiter

    But FCSA CEO Julia Kermode welcomed the chancellor’s move, which her organisation believes will also include the contractors that are engaged via compliant umbrellas who genuinely employ them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jemetpl
    replied
    Originally posted by vwdan View Post
    Is that confirmed? Not being a troll - when I looked there was very little in the way of technical advice
    I think Sunak said this during his speech on Friday but I could be wrong.

    If umbrella contractors aren’t covered, I’m puzzled to what our status actually is. Are we employees or self employed?

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by vwdan View Post
    Is that confirmed? Not being a troll - when I looked there was very little in the way of technical advice
    There is no technical advice as things are being announced on the fly and implementing these systems are going to be a nightmare...

    Leave a comment:


  • vwdan
    replied
    Originally posted by Jemetpl View Post
    The 20% isn’t relevant as no employer is obliged to pay it.
    Is that confirmed? Not being a troll - when I looked there was very little in the way of technical advice

    Leave a comment:


  • Jemetpl
    replied
    The 20% isn’t relevant as no employer is obliged to pay it.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Jemetpl View Post
    Just had this from Paystream:

    “ We are still exploring this and working with the FCSA to explore all available options but currently it looks like umbrella workers are not included in the eligible population.”

    If it’s possible for something to be astonishing and not surprising at the same time, this is it. It seems that we’re employees when it suits but not when it doesn’t.
    Umbrella's can't afford to pay the other 20% ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Jemetpl
    replied
    Just had this from Paystream:

    “ We are still exploring this and working with the FCSA to explore all available options but currently it looks like umbrella workers are not included in the eligible population.”

    If it’s possible for something to be astonishing and not surprising at the same time, this is it. It seems that we’re employees when it suits but not when it doesn’t.

    Leave a comment:


  • PerfectStorm
    replied
    Originally posted by Loofah View Post
    Anything from IPSE published yet? I'm benched so not expecting anything but would be nice to have clarity.
    It would be nice to hear something other than “we call on the government to...”

    Leave a comment:


  • Loofah
    replied
    Anything from IPSE published yet? I'm benched so not expecting anything but would be nice to have clarity.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ari
    replied
    Originally posted by PerfectStorm View Post
    So er.... anyone thinking what I'm thinking?
    What I am thinking is that it's us contractors currently working who bail out the permies and the contractors not currently working are not getting any support.

    The money will come:

    A) from taxes we still are paying as contractors, either personally or via our Ltd

    B) from printed money, which will cause inflation and reduce the real value of any money in our company bank account

    Losex2

    Meanwhile, permies in the scheme will not be contributing any tax, and will be receiving payments from this pot

    Not sure if any contractor without work currently can benefit from this scheme... probably not, so it seems like unfair scheme

    It's good they are trying to help people in need, but it doesn't seem they thought this well

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X