He has a point...
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Harry & Meghan stepping down
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Harry & Meghan stepping down"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Whorty View Postthe gammon loving press
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by unixman View PostThe way they announced it seems like a deliberate insult to the Queen. Or if not an insult, at least publicly disrespectful. Why would they do that? Barmy. Or deluded.
Some newspapers are saying it has all been plotted for ages, was Meghan's plan all along, and reading far too much into it. Daft. We can't know what is going on inside a relationship or what passes in the minds of others. Just take events at face value.
Happy to pay for their ongoing security, but little else. And the titles will have to go. Lastly, as someone pointed out above, a "transatlantic lifestyle" = environmental homicide.The way they announced it seems like a deliberate insult to the Queen. Or if not an insult, at least publicly disrespectful. Why would they do that?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostI would prefer to stop this waste and let Tony B'liar take his chances...
Tony Blair's police protection costs taxpayers millions, report claims | Politics | The Guardian
If someone bumped off the war criminal I doubt anyone would really care.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ladymuck View PostHmm...
I'm not so keen on paying for their security. If they don't want to be part of the royal family then they shouldn't get any of the services that the tax payer funds. Who is going to pay for their Canadian lifestyle? The Brits certainly shouldn't but I also don't think it's fair to lump it on the Canadians either.
I would prefer to stop this waste and let Tony B'liar take his chances...
Tony Blair's police protection costs taxpayers millions, report claims | Politics | The Guardian
Blair requires as many as 12 police protection officers following his role as prime minister and his advocacy of the invasion of Iraq in 2003, a Daily Telegraph investigation published on Friday claims.Documents seen by the Telegraph allegedly show that Blair sometimes visits as many as five countries a week, at a potential cost of between £14,000 and £16,000 to the public purse. The paper reports that each protection officer was likely to be earning at least £56,000, but could earn more than £70,000 given the overtime they accumulate on foreign trips.
In 2010 the Mail on Sunday reported that the cost of Blair’s diplomatic protection was £250,000 a year, double the cost for Gordon Brown.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by unixman View PostThe way they announced it seems like a deliberate insult to the Queen. Or if not an insult, at least publicly disrespectful. Why would they do that? Barmy. Or deluded.
Some newspapers are saying it has all been plotted for ages, was Meghan's plan all along, and reading far too much into it. Daft. We can't know what is going on inside a relationship or what passes in the minds of others. Just take events at face value.
Happy to pay for their ongoing security, but little else. And the titles will have to go. Lastly, as someone pointed out above, a "transatlantic lifestyle" = environmental homicide.
I'm not so keen on paying for their security. If they don't want to be part of the royal family then they shouldn't get any of the services that the tax payer funds. Who is going to pay for their Canadian lifestyle? The Brits certainly shouldn't but I also don't think it's fair to lump it on the Canadians either.
Leave a comment:
-
The way they announced it seems like a deliberate insult to the Queen. Or if not an insult, at least publicly disrespectful. Why would they do that? Barmy. Or deluded.
Some newspapers are saying it has all been plotted for ages, was Meghan's plan all along, and reading far too much into it. Daft. We can't know what is going on inside a relationship or what passes in the minds of others. Just take events at face value.
Happy to pay for their ongoing security, but little else. And the titles will have to go. Lastly, as someone pointed out above, a "transatlantic lifestyle" = environmental homicide.
Leave a comment:
-
For me this is just another example of why a Royal should only marry another royal
Leave a comment:
-
Sadly..
For me this is just another example of why a Royal should only marry another royal. Meghan just wants to be a celebrity and make as much out of the situation as she can.
It is almost certain to end up hurting Harry and with a divorce and a lot of damage to the institution of the Monarchy.
The only way to preserve a Monarchy is for those in line to be dedicated to public duties and to avoid any personal interests.
Sadly they both need to loose their titles and be pushed out, in the interest of the overall preservation of there even being a Royal family.
I am strongly a Monarchist though I lived overseas for 12 years even that was in one of our remaining territories.
Leave a comment:
-
Yeh, the amount of coverage in some papers regarding this boring issue is quite ridiculous.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Whorty View Post8 pages? Really? Dedicated to 2 young people who are presumably in love but aren't doing what the gammon loving press want them to do.
Hilarious ..... the red tops have hounded them out of the country, and are now p'd off that their (the red tops) little money spinner is buggering off to the US to make their own money.
Gammons. Don'tcha just love 'em
Leave a comment:
-
8 pages? Really? Dedicated to 2 young people who are presumably in love but aren't doing what the gammon loving press want them to do.
Hilarious ..... the red tops have hounded them out of the country, and are now p'd off that their (the red tops) little money spinner is buggering off to the US to make their own money.
Gammons. Don'tcha just love 'em
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostA troll once said to me:It’s remarkable why there is so much resentment towards the likes of Ms Markle, David Lammy, Diane Abbott, Sam Gyimah and Chuka Umunna - I can’t think of a logical reason as to why this might be happening!
Leave a comment:
-
A troll once said to me:
Rather sad what has become of our once great country in the past 4 years.Nationalism and xenophobia have swung praise and advantage towards people like Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson who seek to divide our country, and instead turned resentment and contempt towards the efforts of people like Meghan Markle.
It’s remarkable why there is so much resentment towards the likes of Ms Markle, David Lammy, Diane Abbott, Sam Gyimah and Chuka Umunna - I can’t think of a logical reason as to why this might be happening!
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Yesterday 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
Leave a comment: