Originally posted by NigelJK
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "UK’s Labour would cost companies £300bn in workers’ share swipe"
Collapse
-
FTFY, I remember it also.where ordinary people got their heads kicked in for being a black leg in an un-balloted strike
Leave a comment:
-
the opinion that I held on both strikes was that both Sirs and Scargill were a little less street wise than they should have been.Originally posted by WTFH View PostDid you hold the opinion?
Leave a comment:
-
UK’s Labour would cost companies £300bn in workers’ share swipe
What do you mean “too”? I didn’t arrive in the U.K. until the 90’s, Maggie is all yours....Originally posted by vetran View Postboo hoo
maggies child here too.
Repeatedly made a job for myself and enjoyed prosperity. Keep on blaming others for your misfortune. Its yours!
You’re missing the point of my (limited) soclalism. I’ve been a conservative voter most of my life, but I can still have empathy with others that are not as fortunate and rely on labour legislation to protect them.
Leave a comment:
-
I was working in the steel industry in 1980 and a member of ISTC. It was an opinion held by many of the conduct of Bill Sirs. Other colleagues expressed the same opinion about Scargill. Were you alive and working at that time?Originally posted by WTFH View PostNo there wasn’t, John. You made it up, like all your dull opinions, dull trolling, etc.
Arthur's interview poses questions - Paul Routledge - Mirror Online
Also, for your information, the middle and senior management branch of ISTC did not vote for the steel strike in 1980Last edited by JohntheBike; 4 September 2019, 08:27.
Leave a comment:
-
There was a suggestion that both Bill Sirs (ISTC) and Arthur Scargill (NUM) were in league with Maggie as neither followed the wishes of a large proportion of their membership in calling their respective strikes and both didn't really have a cohesive plan. Maggie would have found great difficulty politically in making the redundancies which followed both strikes if it were not for those strikes.Originally posted by meridian View PostYou’re right, I wasn’t brought brought up under a communist regime.
I was brought up in the 70s and 80s where workers had to go on strike for hard-fought rights, where ordinary people got their heads kicked in for daring to ask for a fair day’s wage for a fair day’s work.
So perhaps wannabe totalitarians like yourself should be grateful that others have fought for the rights that you are so keen to enjoy, but want to deny to others.
It should have been plain to Scargill that McGregor, who had orchestrated the steel industry changes, would do the same with the miners. Scargill was a fool to take him and Maggie on in the way that he did. I guess both men enjoyed their pensions.
I have always laid the blame for the 1984 miners strike at the feet of Joe Gormley, who effectively brought down the Conservative Government in 1974. I said then that there would be repercussions, and Maggie proved so.
Leave a comment:
-
Never were truer words spoken in jest.Originally posted by Zigenare View PostYou're effin' big bollocks when he's banned, aren't you? As soon as he's back you'll have your tongue rammed so far up his arse that sasguru will be creaming in his dungarees!
Zig - in "just thought I'd lighten the mood" mode!
Leave a comment:
-
You're effin' big bollocks when he's banned, aren't you? As soon as he's back you'll have your tongue rammed so far up his arse that sasguru will be creaming in his dungarees!Originally posted by WTFH View PostThus spake the man who blames the EU for everything that is wrong with the UK.
Zig - in "just thought I'd lighten the mood" mode!
Leave a comment:
-
Well maybe not communist but the labour of the 70's was pretty ******* close.Originally posted by meridian View PostYou’re right, I wasn’t brought brought up under a communist regime.
I was brought up in the 70s and 80s where workers had to go on strike for hard-fought rights, where ordinary people got their heads kicked in for daring to ask for a fair day’s wage for a fair day’s work.
So perhaps wannabe totalitarians like yourself should be grateful that others have fought for the rights that you are so keen to enjoy, but want to deny to others.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: