Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Cambridge dictionary may need to update their definitions.
They've updated their definition of a clueless twunt that makes sweeping generalisations about a whole rack of topics that he is breathtakingly under-equipped to comment upon.
I'd suggest that class consists of a mix of:-
Historical level of family privilege
Cultural interests/activities
Employment type
Social interests/activities
Dictionaries probably fail at nuance.
Wikipedia seems very American based on this subject
Did you ever think about trying Google search "Working Class Definition"
Of course. The definitions are inconclusive and full of tautologies, hence the question to the wider audience.
From Wikipedia
The working class (or labouring class) comprises those engaged in waged or salaried labour, especially in manual-labour occupations and industrial work.[2] Working-class occupations (see also "Designation of workers by collar color") include blue-collar jobs, some white-collar jobs, and most pink-collar jobs. Members of the working class rely for their income exclusively upon their earnings from wage labour; thus, according to the more inclusive definitions, the category can include almost all of the working population of industrialized economies, as well as those employed in the urban areas (cities, towns, villages) of non-industrialized economies or in the rural workforce.
In Marxist theory and socialist literature, the term working class is often used interchangeably with the term proletariat and includes all workers who expend both physical and mental labour (salaried knowledge workers and white-collar workers) to produce economic value for the owners of the means of production (the bourgeoisie in Marxist literature).[3]
Working Class Cambridge Dictionary defiinition
"a social group that consists of people who earn little money, often being paid only for the hours or days that they work, and who usually do physical work:
The working class usually react/reacts in a predictable way to government policies."
Middle Class Cambridge Dictionary defiinition
"UK a social group that consists of well-educated people, such as doctors, lawyers, and teachers, who have good jobs and are not poor, but are not very rich:
The upper middle class tend to go into business or the professions, becoming, for example, lawyers, doctors, or accountants."
Upper Class Cambridge Dictionary defiinition
" a social group consisting of the people who have the highest social rank and who are usually rich:
The upper classes usually send their children to expensive private schools."
The first definition you've provided says income exclusively from wage labour (including salaried knowledge workers), but nothing about level of earnings, but your second one says "little money". The two definitions are incompatible. In the first definition, salaried IT workers would be considered "working class", but not in the second (if they earn enough - "earning enough" not being defined....)
Where does the Pimlico Plumber fit in the Cambridge definitions? He's a plumber, tradies aren't on their short list of "well-educated", but he's also fairly well off. Is he excluded from "working class" due to his wealth, and also excluded from "middle class" due to his trade?
"The working class usually react/reacts in a predictable way to government policies". WTF does that actually mean?
The upper classes usually send their children to expensive private schools."
Know many amongst my fraternity who send their spawn to expensive private schools and it is clear they're running their health into the ground trying to keep up with the Jones. Even the Jones are looking burnt out. Even then the said school life is not of benefit to all who attend. Some have special needs, which just causes more stress. But that's the way the South West rolls. Spend spend spend like they've got loadsa money when the reality couldn't be further from the truth.
Cambridge dictionary may need to update their definitions.
Working Class Cambridge Dictionary defiinition
"a social group that consists of people who earn little money, often being paid only for the hours or days that they work, and who usually do physical work:
The working class usually react/reacts in a predictable way to government policies."
Middle Class Cambridge Dictionary defiinition
"UK a social group that consists of well-educated people, such as doctors, lawyers, and teachers, who have good jobs and are not poor, but are not very rich:
The upper middle class tend to go into business or the professions, becoming, for example, lawyers, doctors, or accountants."
Upper Class Cambridge Dictionary defiinition
" a social group consisting of the people who have the highest social rank and who are usually rich:
The upper classes usually send their children to expensive private schools."
Did you ever think about trying Google search "Working Class Definition"
From Wikipedia
The working class (or labouring class) comprises those engaged in waged or salaried labour, especially in manual-labour occupations and industrial work.[2] Working-class occupations (see also "Designation of workers by collar color") include blue-collar jobs, some white-collar jobs, and most pink-collar jobs. Members of the working class rely for their income exclusively upon their earnings from wage labour; thus, according to the more inclusive definitions, the category can include almost all of the working population of industrialized economies, as well as those employed in the urban areas (cities, towns, villages) of non-industrialized economies or in the rural workforce.
In Marxist theory and socialist literature, the term working class is often used interchangeably with the term proletariat and includes all workers who expend both physical and mental labour (salaried knowledge workers and white-collar workers) to produce economic value for the owners of the means of production (the bourgeoisie in Marxist literature).[3]
Sure, if you like. Looking down on people doesn’t make the lookees working class, though, it only says more about you.
It’s a genuine question, which I thought someone on here might at least have an attempt at. What makes someone “working class”?
Personally, my Dad left school with no qualifications, finished his trade in the 60s as a mechanic, worked for a while in the family trade (saw milling) and then retrained in his late 30s as a drainlayer. Yet I’ve never seen ourselves as “working class”.
From what you say, as long as there’s someone to look down upon then you’re not working class?
Did you ever think about trying Google search "Working Class Definition"
From Wikipedia
The working class (or labouring class) comprises those engaged in waged or salaried labour, especially in manual-labour occupations and industrial work.[2] Working-class occupations (see also "Designation of workers by collar color") include blue-collar jobs, some white-collar jobs, and most pink-collar jobs. Members of the working class rely for their income exclusively upon their earnings from wage labour; thus, according to the more inclusive definitions, the category can include almost all of the working population of industrialized economies, as well as those employed in the urban areas (cities, towns, villages) of non-industrialized economies or in the rural workforce.
In Marxist theory and socialist literature, the term working class is often used interchangeably with the term proletariat and includes all workers who expend both physical and mental labour (salaried knowledge workers and white-collar workers) to produce economic value for the owners of the means of production (the bourgeoisie in Marxist literature).[3]
Sure, if you like. Looking down on people doesn’t make the lookees working class, though, it only says more about you.
It’s a genuine question, which I thought someone on here might at least have an attempt at. What makes someone “working class”?
Personally, my Dad left school with no qualifications, finished his trade in the 60s as a mechanic, worked for a while in the family trade (saw milling) and then retrained in his late 30s as a drainlayer. Yet I’ve never seen ourselves as “working class”.
From what you say, as long as there’s someone to look down upon then you’re not working class?
Leave a comment: