• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Regulation to combat fake news, say MPs"

Collapse

  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    The Moderators of course!
    Fake news.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Future funding and the career aims of the author(s). At a guess.
    If only.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    We could just educate people to look at the sources of their news and evaluate for themselves.

    I remember studying for a degree and a person tried to quote the Sun in a paper as evidence for their argument. He wasn't the only one not sure why quoting the Sun was not evidence of a truth or fact.

    It had to be explained to him in slow words that peer reviewed evidence is better than the Sun. Though to be fair, I imagine these days I would even question academic papers, their sources and goals.
    Future funding and the career aims of the author(s). At a guess.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Ah - the Re-Edukation Camps...

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    We could just educate people to look at the sources of their news and evaluate for themselves.

    I remember studying for a degree and a person tried to quote the Sun in a paper as evidence for their argument. He wasn't the only one not sure why quoting the Sun was not evidence of a truth or fact.

    It had to be explained to him in slow words that peer reviewed evidence is better than the Sun. Though to be fair, I imagine these days I would even question academic papers, their sources and goals.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by filthy1980 View Post
    Reason and Evidence
    That is 'how', not 'who'.

    Leave a comment:


  • filthy1980
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On View Post
    Who decides what is true and what is fake?
    Reason and Evidence

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Why can't you get toilet paper with politicians' faces printed on the sheets?
    Winston Churchill is on a £5 note, use that - it probably skids worse than IZAL so be careful. It is washable though...

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Why can't you get toilet paper with politicians' faces printed on the sheets?

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    In sorta related news, I'm amazed at how these guys managed to get Google search for "best toilet paper in the world" to show the Pakistani flag in all the top links on Google in 5 days. You should hire them atW!

    Pulwama attack: Google searches 'hijacked' to link Pakistan flag to toilet paper - BBC News

    Oh hang on, it was fake news according to Google:

    Pakistan flag: No evidence our images showed Pakistan flag for toilet paper: Google

    The world is certainly confooooosing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by TwoWolves View Post
    This is a very slippery slope they are embarking on. Like the religious/race hatred legislation, it will soon be bent to serve other purposes for the simple reason it's bad law and it can.

    What has got into this generation of politicians?
    Originally posted by Jog On View Post
    Who decides what is true and what is fake?
    I'm agreeing with the nutjobs! Must be my libertarian left streak.

    The cat is out of the bag with fake news and to seek to censor it is to establish some of the apparatus of a police state.

    The best that society can do, and even this is a stretch, is to attempt to get transparency on funding. If you are going to pay for adverts or news, then there is a money trail. Even this is probably doomed to end up in some offshore trust rabbit hole.

    So we need to recognise there is a problem, but not all problems should be solved.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On View Post
    Who decides what is true and what is fake?
    The Moderators of course!

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Who decides what is true and what is fake?

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Just delete half the posts in Brexit forum. Job done.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by TwoWolves View Post
    This is a very slippery slope they are embarking on. Like the religious/race hatred legislation, it will soon be bent to serve other purposes for the simple reason it's bad law and it can.

    What has got into this generation of politicians?

    So, to avoid the slippery slope, do we just allow lies to be presented as facts?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X