• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Komrades!

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Komrades!"

Collapse

  • Hobosapien
    replied

    Is a pledge more legally binding that a promise.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by Andy2 View Post
    what are you on about?
    corp tax in germany is 30%
    corp tax in UK is 19%
    Not for long mate.

    Theresa May pledges to slash taxes to lowest rate in G20 to make Britain a post-Brexit economic powerhouse

    Leave a comment:


  • Andy2
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    I can move to Germany and more or less half my tax, which will go up big time under Labour, and now they propose to confiscate sizeable stake in companies (initially medium ones, but I am sure it won't take them long to look at smaller). Fook that tulip, this is all brought by you fooking Brexiter morons
    what are you on about?
    corp tax in germany is 30%
    corp tax in UK is 19%

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by contractorinatractor View Post
    Why? The flagship policies promoted appear to match Sweden and Denmark. I imagine if you were to create such a comparison it would simply back up Labour as getting worth votes.

    Still, stick to the non-credible Venezuela comparison, as it simply makes those ardent tories look even more ridiculous.

    Because Jezzy lauded the achievements of communism in Valenzuela as it turned into a basket case. His politics are crush the rich, money for nothing and poor taste in chicks.

    Denis MacShane: On thuggish Venezuela Corbyn looks the other way | London Evening Standard

    This is not a solution to our ills, its a disaster.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    I said that JRM, BoJo, Gove, etc were part of the UK government. Not that they are the sole functioning members of the UK government.

    Your attempt at forming a cognitive argument based on twisting what I said has failed.
    And yet...

    Methinks the arguing will continue...

    Leave a comment:


  • Bean
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    I said that JRM, BoJo, Gove, etc were part of the UK government. Not that they are the sole functioning members of the UK government.

    Your attempt at forming a cognitive argument based on twisting what I said has failed.
    Good, now you understand that, you've answered your own question - that's why they (Bojo & Gove) couldn't unilaterally deliver any promises made by the non-governmental organisation.

    HTH BIDI

    Now wipe your screen.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Bean View Post
    Leave campaign ≠ UK Government
    JRM,Gove,Bojo ≠ UK Government
    Votes ≠ Promises
    Thinking leaving is a good idea ≠ calling/wanting a snap election


    I've tried to simplify it for you, as the spittle is clearly obstructing your view.

    I said that JRM, BoJo, Gove, etc were part of the UK government. Not that they are the sole functioning members of the UK government.

    Your attempt at forming a cognitive argument based on twisting what I said has failed.

    Leave a comment:


  • contractorinatractor
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    It going to be like this....Just replace the word Venezuela with Britain and read-on...

    How Venezuela's crisis developed and drove out millions of people - BBC News

    Why? The flagship policies promoted appear to match Sweden and Denmark. I imagine if you were to create such a comparison it would simply back up Labour as getting worth votes.

    Still, stick to the non-credible Venezuela comparison, as it simply makes those ardent tories look even more ridiculous.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Actually not entirely a bad idea

    Changes to planning guidance will aim to encourage private investment to double onshore wind power over 12 years, while offshore wind will be increased sevenfold and solar power threefold.

    whether the mix & quantity is right I am not sure.

    Plenty of suggestions that centralised onshore wind power isn't that effective.

    No mention of thermal or storage.

    It is however supporting a new industry.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bean
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Are you saying that no one with any authority in the country had a plan for what to do after the vote?
    Were JRM, BoJo, Gove, etc not part of the group who thought Leave was a good idea? Are they also not part of the government?



    Were JRM, BoJo, Gove, etc not part of the group who thought Leave was a good idea and sold that idea to the unintelligent masses? Are they also not part of the government?
    Leave campaign ≠ UK Government
    JRM,Gove,Bojo ≠ UK Government
    Votes ≠ Promises
    Thinking leaving is a good idea ≠ calling/wanting a snap election


    I've tried to simplify it for you, as the spittle is clearly obstructing your view.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Bean View Post
    Why would anyone expect the government of the day, to have plans in place, for promises (that it doesn't agree with) made by a non-governmental organisation with no rights to negotiate and/or legislate on behalf of the UK?
    Are you saying that no one with any authority in the country had a plan for what to do after the vote?
    Were JRM, BoJo, Gove, etc not part of the group who thought Leave was a good idea? Are they also not part of the government?

    Originally posted by Bean View Post
    Leavers never asked for a snap GE, therefore it was not the fault, action, responsibility etc etc of leave voters.
    Were JRM, BoJo, Gove, etc not part of the group who thought Leave was a good idea and sold that idea to the unintelligent masses? Are they also not part of the government?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bean
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Because the brainwashed morons who voted to leave thought that Britain would be strong in negotiations and that our government would have a plan in place to deliver the promises.
    Then the government thought it would prove how wonderful it was by holding a snap general election, where it lost seats.
    Then the DUP got involved in running the UK.

    And if the Tories stay in power after the next GE, their leader will most likely be JRM or BoJo. Both of whom are corrupt deranged idiots, out of touch with the real world, who hope that people will support their amoral, corrupt plans that are purely based around how to line their own pockets, with no interest in actually doing what is best for the UK.

    So while the Leave community may base their lives around trying to find someone else to blame - "let's blame the EU", "let's blame the opposition", "let's blame foreigners", "let's blame the truth", some time the Leave camp should take responsibility for their actions and for their decisions, rather than just trying to find the next group to blame.
    Why would anyone expect the government of the day, to have plans in place, for promises (that it doesn't agree with) made by a non-governmental organisation with no rights to negotiate and/or legislate on behalf of the UK?

    Leavers never asked for a snap GE, therefore it was not the fault, action, responsibility etc etc of leave voters.

    Your premises make you appear to be a moron.

    Besides, Nigel meant Corbyn, but you just wanted to bash tories and leave voters (or 'blame the opposition' as I believe you like to call it) - so knock yourself out but don't forget to wipe away the spittle from your screen after you're done.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by NigelJK View Post
    I fail to see how a bunch of brainwashed morons voting in a deranged idiot is the fault of the leave vote.

    Because the brainwashed morons who voted to leave thought that Britain would be strong in negotiations and that our government would have a plan in place to deliver the promises.
    Then the government thought it would prove how wonderful it was by holding a snap general election, where it lost seats.
    Then the DUP got involved in running the UK.

    And if the Tories stay in power after the next GE, their leader will most likely be JRM or BoJo. Both of whom are corrupt deranged idiots, out of touch with the real world, who hope that people will support their amoral, corrupt plans that are purely based around how to line their own pockets, with no interest in actually doing what is best for the UK.

    So while the Leave community may base their lives around trying to find someone else to blame - "let's blame the EU", "let's blame the opposition", "let's blame foreigners", "let's blame the truth", some time the Leave camp should take responsibility for their actions and for their decisions, rather than just trying to find the next group to blame.

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Time to pack them bags me old matey.

    Apart from the obvious trolling I fail to see how a bunch of brainwashed morons voting in a deranged idiot is the fault of the leave vote. They have done the same for decade and its always the country that suffers. What they don't understand is that their left wing pseudo communism requires a healthy capitalist regime in place for it to work. Just ask the USSR.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    In France the French expect people to speak French or at least try to, how is that surrender vs 10 languages local UK council prints Govt related stuff about?
    Same is true here in Deutschland. Even though my spoken German is Überraschend to many, it is certainly met with appreciation.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X