• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Really?

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Really?"

Collapse

  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by Yorkie62 View Post
    You mean the very expensive Nukes on the very expensive Submarines?

    I would agree that that is possibly the only realistic solution to the middle east peace but the consequences would be disastrous for the world, not just humanity as a whole. The problem with Nukes is that you cannot contain the effects. They are the only weapons that are designed never to be used.
    Nukes are a lot cheaper than a conventional force though.
    https://fullfact.org/economy/what-cost-running-trident/

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by Yorkie62 View Post
    You mean the very expensive Nukes on the very expensive Submarines?

    I would agree that that is possibly the only realistic solution to the middle east peace but the consequences would be disastrous for the world, not just humanity as a whole. The problem with Nukes is that you cannot contain the effects. They are the only weapons that are designed never to be used.
    You forgot the... very expensive Nukes sat on very expensive missiles (leased from the US) on the very expensive Submarines?

    Speaking of which, looks like Burghfield is expecting some new work after all the building that's been going on there!

    Leave a comment:


  • Yorkie62
    replied
    Originally posted by GreenMirror View Post
    If the UK spent less on defense and more on its economy(like Germany) it would be a lot better off.

    If we need to fight a war just unleash the nukes.
    You mean the very expensive Nukes on the very expensive Submarines?

    I would agree that that is possibly the only realistic solution to the middle east peace but the consequences would be disastrous for the world, not just humanity as a whole. The problem with Nukes is that you cannot contain the effects. They are the only weapons that are designed never to be used.

    Leave a comment:


  • GreenMirror
    replied
    If the UK spent less on defense and more on its economy(like Germany) it would be a lot better off.

    If we need to fight a war just unleash the nukes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Yorkie62
    replied
    Originally posted by DoctorStrangelove View Post
    I seem to recall dear old Putin saying as much.

    Useless on their own, it requires a small fleet of support ships.
    Yes they do require a number of 'protection vessels' when in theatre because they are themselves normally very lightly armed by comparison to a Frigate, Destroyer or Cruiser, but flat tops are still of significant tactical importance. How else would you be able to provide air support to troops on the ground when miles from home, e.g. Falklands, with no access to a suitable land based airfield.
    Remember, we now have no long range aircraft capable of providing such support from dear old blightly, and even when we did, they do not carry the sort of Precision Strike Effects weapons that either the Typhoon of F35 Lightning can/will carry.
    Last edited by Yorkie62; 21 August 2018, 07:39.

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    I seem to recall dear old Putin saying as much.

    Useless on their own, it requires a small fleet of support ships.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Can't help thinking aircraft carriers in this day and age are massive great pink elephants. Or is that white elephants?

    One nuclear depth charge set off below it, and the whole thing would split in half and sink in minutes, if not seconds

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    helicopters are aircraft;

    I still reckon we'd be better off with a reactor in there.

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Well considering that it's an aircraft carrier without any aircraft this is quite a turn-up for the books
    helicopters are aircraft;

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Yes it all becomes more surreal by the day.

    I wonder what will happen when Turkey joins the Warsaw Pact.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    I believe that the engines need to go to Turkey for overhaul and that the US actually negotiates the purchase of these jets on the UK's behalf...

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    How do you think a couple of four F35s made it to the UK a couple of months ago?

    Did the swallows bring them?
    no they waited for it to stop raining.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by DoctorStrangelove View Post
    You're making the assumption that the Septics have actually managed to make the feckers fly for more than 5 minutes.

    https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=f3...hrome&ie=UTF-8
    How do you think a couple of four F35s made it to the UK a couple of months ago?

    Did the swallows bring them?
    Last edited by Zigenare; 20 August 2018, 12:14.

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Originally posted by PhiltheGreek View Post
    Nazi gold and looted artwork too. The Swiss will do anything for money.

    One wonders why they didn't just fly the planes over though, it'd be quicker and cheaper.
    You're making the assumption that the Septics have actually managed to make the feckers fly for more than 5 minutes.

    https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=f3...hrome&ie=UTF-8

    Leave a comment:


  • PhiltheGreek
    replied
    Originally posted by BR14 View Post
    you've been in germany too long, son, - get a sense of humour fitted, i think the swiss do a good one
    Nazi gold and looted artwork too. The Swiss will do anything for money.

    One wonders why they didn't just fly the planes over though, it'd be quicker and cheaper.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X