• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Important legal proceedings"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    Legal reasons. It might help if they said what those legal reasons were. She could have some sort of learning disability, or be in a public position likely to cause her embarrassment. Or it might be because she is a victim and therefore has the right to anonymity. Anyways, the comments section of the paper I linked the original article from has her named by, I assume, one of the defendant's buddies.

    The offence was, appropriately enough, Assault.
    she accused him of sexual assault, she quite reasonably has a right to anonymity. Now why he doesn't is the issue. If they want to reveal someone's identity in such a case they should apply to a judge.

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    They've found him not guilty of whatever offence playing with a ladies bottom is. That said he's not in the clear. They've named and put him all over the papers. Not sure why they didn't for her. Seems tad unfair. Poor bugger(er).
    Legal reasons. It might help if they said what those legal reasons were. She could have some sort of learning disability, or be in a public position likely to cause her embarrassment. Or it might be because she is a victim and therefore has the right to anonymity. Anyways, the comments section of the paper I linked the original article from has her named by, I assume, one of the defendant's buddies.

    The offence was, appropriately enough, Assault.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Not Guilty!!

    They've found him not guilty of whatever offence playing with a ladies bottom is. That said he's not in the clear. They've named and put him all over the papers. Not sure why they didn't for her. Seems tad unfair. Poor bugger(er).

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by BoredBloke View Post
    2 in the pink and 1 in the stink....its called the shocker. Steel Panther at their best
    Extra Extra read all about it
    I wanna show kinda ya something new
    Now If your having trouble just getting a boner
    Here's something cool that'll work for you
    It's way better than a Dirty Sanchez
    Some will say that its a bit extreme
    Close your eyes and spread your legs now
    What I'm about to do will make you scream
    You better lube it up 'cause its easier to get it deeper in
    In her hole ??so?? she screams
    Two in the Pink and one in the stink
    That's called the Shocker
    Two in the Pink and one in the stink
    Yeah ??woah?? the Shocker
    It's easy to find chicks that really dig it
    In the city or in the town
    You can spot a rookie who's bin using the shocker
    He walks around with a pinky that's brown
    When ya do too much butter sugar
    And your hard meat stick won't stand
    Add your middle finger ??to/two abreast the middle??
    And spread the shocker all across the land
    Its time to raise your hands and salute the movement that rocks all girls
    You will learn this at school
    So pay attention here
    Two in the Pink and one in the stink
    That's called the Shocker
    Two in the Pink and one in the stink
    Yeah ??call?? the Shocker
    You can do it in the bathroom or do it in your car
    Or do it in the alley right behind the bar
    Two in the Pink and one in the stink
    That's called the Shocker
    YEAH!!
    Two in the Pink and one in the stink
    That's called the Shocker
    Two in the Pink and one in the stink
    Yeah ??hail?? the Shocker
    You can do it in the bathroom or do it in your car
    Or do it in the alley right behind the bar
    Two in the Pink and one in the stink
    That's called the Shocker
    Here it comes!
    Shock Shock Shocker
    Shock Shock Shocker
    Shock Shock Shocker
    Shock Shock Shocker
    Come on and Shocker
    Do you wanna ??20 balls of?? heavy metal power
    In your vagina and your butthole too

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    If he'd have been fined a tenner when the event took place, then he'd be given the same sentence today. You always get the punishment according to sentencing guidelines at the time.
    That's how it's supposed to work, but we'll see. He'll probably get ten years. I mean not that I'm bothered one way or another, that's just his hard luck.

    But dredging up cases from that long ago which were considered pretty trivial at the time is just surreal, and so obviously has an ulterior political motive rather than any genuine concern for justice.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    Or not...

    Finger

    Sounds to me like another fine use of public funds.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdITFVpAJvM

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    He was going for the Dirty Sanchez

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Absolutely - It's vital to try and distract the plebs from anything that actually matters, like Brexit or the rising immigrant crime rate, etc, etc

    Why do you think some old guy was recently prosecuted for indecent assault on a teenage boy 60 years ago, when he'd have probably been fined a tenner if he'd been convicted at the time?
    If he'd have been fined a tenner when the event took place, then he'd be given the same sentence today. You always get the punishment according to sentencing guidelines at the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    something don't smell right

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    2 in the pink and 1 in the stink....its called the shocker. Steel Panther at their best

    Leave a comment:


  • Lockhouse
    replied
    Meanwhile, there have still been no successful FGM prosecutions in this country.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    Sounds to me like another fine use of public funds.
    Absolutely - It's vital to try and distract the plebs from anything that actually matters, like Brexit or the rising immigrant crime rate, etc, etc

    Why do you think some old guy was recently prosecuted for indecent assault on a teenage boy 60 years ago, when he'd have probably been fined a tenner if he'd been convicted at the time?

    Leave a comment:


  • PhiltheGreek
    replied
    Don't tell OwlHoot but, before curtains were invented, a similar incident in a cave resulted in the drawing he's trying to decypher.

    Anyway, I bet this bloke feels like an arsehole now.

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    started a topic Important legal proceedings

    Important legal proceedings

    Or not...

    Finger

    Sounds to me like another fine use of public funds.

Working...
X