Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Feckin' "Middle of two lanes" queue policers"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by rsingh View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostThere's something else zipper approvers like NAT should ponder. Why is it that often when the outside lane is coned off the cones extend back, far beyond the stretch where work is actually in progress or planned, to the previous junction or roundabout?
Obviously the idea is to siphon traffic into a single lane from the outset, knowing that the alternative of a restriction away from the junction would cause more of a bottleneck solely on account of merging cheats, and that rather proves my point.
You think you observe something (perhaps once, perhaps everywhere, who knows? there's no data given), come up with a theory for it, and apparently that's proof. The scientific method just passed you by, didn't it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostThere's something else zipper approvers like NAT should ponder. Why is it that often when the outside lane is coned off the cones extend back, far beyond the stretch where work is actually in progress or planned, to the previous junction or roundabout?
Obviously the idea is to siphon traffic into a single lane from the outset, knowing that the alternative of a restriction away from the junction would cause more of a bottleneck solely on account of merging cheats, and that rather proves my point.
The majority of the client sites I have to drive to are on a route where I have to merge to get onto the slip road to a dual carriageway or motorway. If people stay in the left hand lane only the queue ends up going back to the next junction or roundabout. If there is an accident somewhere even using both lanes this can go back several miles and block routes going elsewhere.
Frequently due to the volume of traffic you then have to merge at the same speed to get from the slip road onto the dual carriageway or motorway.
Some people who stay in the left hand lane think they are queuing properly, and try to block others from merging in from the right, but all that happens once you are on the dual carriageway or motorway is you end up overtaking them anyway.
There are other drivers who clearly can't cope with merging and I frequently find I have to let in one to two drivers in front of me get from the slip road to the dual carriageway/motorway. The maximum I've allowed in is five as they couldn't time the gaps between two lorries and a coach. Hence when I see others delibrately blocking the right hand lane I simply think they can't drive properly.
Leave a comment:
-
There's something else zipper approvers like NAT should ponder. Why is it that often when the outside lane is coned off the cones extend back, far beyond the stretch where work is actually in progress or planned, to the previous junction or roundabout?
Obviously the idea is to siphon traffic into a single lane from the outset, knowing that the alternative of a restriction away from the junction would cause more of a bottleneck solely on account of merging cheats, and that rather proves my point.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View PostHmmm. Lot of hackles raised over this issue. I guess the amount of traffic and proximity to a junction must also be factors. Needs a maths model. I used to be good at those once.
From 2000 to 2002 I had to commute halfway round the M25 and back again every day. I read an article about defensive driving and tried to adopt the principles*. Once I got the hang of it, I found driving far more relaxing than before. I don't care what selfish twunts do - I'm just making sure I and my passengers are protected as far as I can.
* Everyone else on the road is a complete moron with the foresight of a 3 week old corpse.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostShe's still finding it hard to get used to driving without the guy waking the red flag in front of her.
Leave a comment:
-
Woman lectures men on driving. Now there’s a first.
Lance Stator, Detectorist
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostI'm pretty sure Cojak was referring to the utter twats who, as well as being zipper cheats bypassing the queue, then have the gall to try queue jumping even more by merging directly behind the car in front of them also merging, rather than abiding by the alternate lanes convention.
One time zippers I can just about cope with, it’s the ones behind them that really do my head in.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostThere is no queue-jumping. That's all in the mind. ...
Leave a comment:
-
It is very clear in this thread who the queue jumping chunts are
Leave a comment:
-
Hmmm. Lot of hackles raised over this issue. I guess the amount of traffic and proximity to a junction must also be factors. Needs a maths model. I used to be good at those once.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostDoes my chunk in....
800 yds to the roadworks when it goes down from 2 lanes to 1 and theres a Tesco lorry straddling both lanes trying to be the "queue cheat police" and stopping people using the inside lane.
Makes no sense at all. Surely the best idea is to use both lanes and "zipper" in at the bottom. Drivers in the uk are just thick.
Stupidly, there was a "hows my driving" thing on the back of the tesco lorry. Surely a bit dull to be playing silly buggers when people can call up to moan about you're driving (which I did).
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Leave a comment: