Originally posted by NotAllThere
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Ok all, mankind is now peoplekind.
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Ok all, mankind is now peoplekind."
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View PostWoman is presumably womb - man, very sexist to name them after a reproductive organ. Maybe equality would be best served by referring to men as knobman or summit.
Incidentally, the word "human" comes from French "humain", so it not connected to the word "man".
I don't think referring to men as "summit" will work well.
Leave a comment:
-
Woman is presumably womb - man, very sexist to name them after a reproductive organ. Maybe equality would be best served by referring to men as knobman or summit.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by woohoo View PostI watched the video and it did not look like it was taken out of context.
He might be back tracking but it did not look like a joke.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostAh, German is great. Even nouns have genders, and none of this fluidity nonsense - just straightforward masculine, feminine and neuter.
Anyway, it turns out, as ever, that what Trudeau said needs to be taken in context. Apparently some woman was going on at religious length, railing against much of Trudeau's agenda, with its "inclusiveness". In response to her saying "mankind", he said "we say 'peoplekind'". It wasn't intended to be taken seriously, rather a putdown to this woman.
During a sometimes difficult meeting for the prime minister the woman asked a long question about charity law. She said that she was from the World Mission Society Church of God, which emphasises “the female aspect” of religion and preaches a “maternal love that’s going to change the future of mankind”.
“We like to say peoplekind, not necessarily mankind,” Mr Trudeau replied, prompting laughter. “Because it’s more inclusive.”
“There you go!” the questioner, who had been booed by the crowd, said.
The idiot conservatives knee-jerkists however just focus on the phrase, not the context. And the usual suspects here foam at the mouth.
Personally, I think it was a bit mean and nasty of him. He could have been more generous, but chose to ridicule her instead.
He might be back tracking but it did not look like a joke.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by woohoo View PostThings are changing, so we need to get with the plan.
Canada PM Trudeau faces PC backlash over 'peoplekind' comment - BBC News
If you could all make the mental adjustment, bugger sorry, the persontal adjustment - Just use the right gender neutral words please.Originally posted by woohoo View PostYou tell him Nat, sorry, sorry, meant to say you tell zim or does he, sorry I mean does zim prefer sie instead of zim?
Anyway, it turns out, as ever, that what Trudeau said needs to be taken in context. Apparently some woman was going on at religious length, railing against much of Trudeau's agenda, with its "inclusiveness". In response to her saying "mankind", he said "we say 'peoplekind'". It wasn't intended to be taken seriously, rather a putdown to this woman.
During a sometimes difficult meeting for the prime minister the woman asked a long question about charity law. She said that she was from the World Mission Society Church of God, which emphasises “the female aspect” of religion and preaches a “maternal love that’s going to change the future of mankind”.
“We like to say peoplekind, not necessarily mankind,” Mr Trudeau replied, prompting laughter. “Because it’s more inclusive.”
“There you go!” the questioner, who had been booed by the crowd, said.
The idiot conservatives knee-jerkists however just focus on the phrase, not the context. And the usual suspects here foam at the mouth.
Personally, I think it was a bit mean and nasty of him. He could have been more generous, but chose to ridicule her instead.
Leave a comment:
-
I can only guess that in the world of Justin, 'humankind' is considered speciesist, and excludes trans-species and alien people?
Nutter!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by woohoo View PostSo, MaMan = Man, WoMan = Woman and Man = All.
Seems very biased against those people that identify as both MaMan and WoMan. Or those that identify as neither MaMan or WoMan.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Jog On View PostPathetic virtue signalling simp. Only thing worse than a raging feminazi is a male white night mangina.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View Postthe problem with ignorance & predjuidice is there is so much of it about!
His and hers, wyf and wer | Macmillan Dictionary Blog
Seems very biased against those people that identify as both MaMan and WoMan. Or those that identify as neither MaMan or WoMan.
Leave a comment:
-
the problem with ignorance & predjuidice is there is so much of it about!
His and hers, wyf and wer | Macmillan Dictionary Blog
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by woohoo View PostYou tell him Nat, sorry, sorry, meant to say you tell zim or does he, sorry I mean does zim prefer sie instead of zim?
Please sort it out.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Leave a comment: