• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Ok all, mankind is now peoplekind."

Collapse

  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    I've not seen the video - I don't care enough to watch. The quote is from the Times, which isn't usually a safe place for virtue signalling - nor a fan of Trudeau.
    I've seen the video. I can't see May or any British politician exposing themselves like that (except for BoJo, fnarrr fnarrr) so he deserves some kudos for that, but it does seem to me be a slightly sarcastic/exasperated response to a very long-winded and weird question, from someone who is part of a Korean cult. It worked in that it shut her down.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Woman is presumably womb - man, very sexist to name them after a reproductive organ. Maybe equality would be best served by referring to men as knobman or summit.
    Woman comes from old English "wifman" (wife-man), and stems from a time when "man" simply meant "human". Womb is Old English, with wamb as a variant spelling, meaning "belly, bowels, heart, uterus." It's not connected to woman.

    Incidentally, the word "human" comes from French "humain", so it not connected to the word "man".

    I don't think referring to men as "summit" will work well.

    Leave a comment:


  • greenlake
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    So, MaMan = Man, WoMan = Woman and Man = All.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Woman is presumably womb - man, very sexist to name them after a reproductive organ. Maybe equality would be best served by referring to men as knobman or summit.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    I watched the video and it did not look like it was taken out of context.

    He might be back tracking but it did not look like a joke.
    I've not seen the video - I don't care enough to watch. The quote is from the Times, which isn't usually a safe place for virtue signalling - nor a fan of Trudeau.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Ah, German is great. Even nouns have genders, and none of this fluidity nonsense - just straightforward masculine, feminine and neuter.

    Anyway, it turns out, as ever, that what Trudeau said needs to be taken in context. Apparently some woman was going on at religious length, railing against much of Trudeau's agenda, with its "inclusiveness". In response to her saying "mankind", he said "we say 'peoplekind'". It wasn't intended to be taken seriously, rather a putdown to this woman.

    During a sometimes difficult meeting for the prime minister the woman asked a long question about charity law. She said that she was from the World Mission Society Church of God, which emphasises “the female aspect” of religion and preaches a “maternal love that’s going to change the future of mankind”.

    “We like to say peoplekind, not necessarily mankind,” Mr Trudeau replied, prompting laughter. “Because it’s more inclusive.”

    “There you go!” the questioner, who had been booed by the crowd, said.


    The idiot conservatives knee-jerkists however just focus on the phrase, not the context. And the usual suspects here foam at the mouth.

    Personally, I think it was a bit mean and nasty of him. He could have been more generous, but chose to ridicule her instead.
    I watched the video and it did not look like it was taken out of context.

    He might be back tracking but it did not look like a joke.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    Things are changing, so we need to get with the plan.

    Canada PM Trudeau faces PC backlash over 'peoplekind' comment - BBC News

    If you could all make the mental adjustment, bugger sorry, the persontal adjustment - Just use the right gender neutral words please.
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    You tell him Nat, sorry, sorry, meant to say you tell zim or does he, sorry I mean does zim prefer sie instead of zim?
    Ah, German is great. Even nouns have genders, and none of this fluidity nonsense - just straightforward masculine, feminine and neuter.

    Anyway, it turns out, as ever, that what Trudeau said needs to be taken in context. Apparently some woman was going on at religious length, railing against much of Trudeau's agenda, with its "inclusiveness". In response to her saying "mankind", he said "we say 'peoplekind'". It wasn't intended to be taken seriously, rather a putdown to this woman.

    During a sometimes difficult meeting for the prime minister the woman asked a long question about charity law. She said that she was from the World Mission Society Church of God, which emphasises “the female aspect” of religion and preaches a “maternal love that’s going to change the future of mankind”.

    “We like to say peoplekind, not necessarily mankind,” Mr Trudeau replied, prompting laughter. “Because it’s more inclusive.”

    “There you go!” the questioner, who had been booed by the crowd, said.


    The idiot conservatives knee-jerkists however just focus on the phrase, not the context. And the usual suspects here foam at the mouth.

    Personally, I think it was a bit mean and nasty of him. He could have been more generous, but chose to ridicule her instead.

    Leave a comment:


  • glebe digital
    replied
    I can only guess that in the world of Justin, 'humankind' is considered speciesist, and excludes trans-species and alien people?

    Nutter!

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    So, MaMan = Man, WoMan = Woman and Man = All.

    Seems very biased against those people that identify as both MaMan and WoMan. Or those that identify as neither MaMan or WoMan.
    I think in old German those sort of people didn't get much of a say.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by Dark Black View Post
    This
    I agree, he is an absolute dick.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dark Black
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On View Post
    Pathetic virtue signalling simp. Only thing worse than a raging feminazi is a male white night mangina.
    This

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    the problem with ignorance & predjuidice is there is so much of it about!

    His and hers, wyf and wer | Macmillan Dictionary Blog
    So, MaMan = Man, WoMan = Woman and Man = All.

    Seems very biased against those people that identify as both MaMan and WoMan. Or those that identify as neither MaMan or WoMan.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    the problem with ignorance & predjuidice is there is so much of it about!

    His and hers, wyf and wer | Macmillan Dictionary Blog

    Leave a comment:


  • HugeWhale
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    You tell him Nat, sorry, sorry, meant to say you tell zim or does he, sorry I mean does zim prefer sie instead of zim?
    I have decided that I am going to identify myself as non-digital gender-neutral. I find your use of the word 'him' offensive.
    Please sort it out.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    I don't think you're allowed to say feminazi - how about neuternazi?

    Hupeoplekind you misogynist idiot.
    You tell him Nat, sorry, sorry, meant to say you tell zim or does he, sorry I mean does zim prefer sie instead of zim?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X